DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX JRE
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No. 03572-08
1 April 2009
Thig is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 26 March 2009. After careful consideration of
your application, the Board concluded that the application was
not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of
justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a
timely manner. It concluded that prior to your discharge by
reason of physical disability on 31 May 1971, you had been of
the diagnoses that resulted in your discharge. -
The evidence may pertain to the timeliness of your application
or to its merits. Absent such additional evidence, further
review of your application is not possible.
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely,
\Deae |
W. DEAN PF B
Executive 1D Yr
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05958-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 26370-5100 Docket. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Record, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2009. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03170-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 2009. The Board concluded that those factors are insufficient to warrant the upgrade of your general discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07792-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2009. In addition, the Board concluded that you failed to submit any new material evidence or other matter in support of your request for reconsideration of your application for “correction of your record to show that you were retired by reason of physical disability; accordingly, the Board denied that request. Absent such additional evidence, further...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05306-09
United States Code section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2009. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00442-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2011. Although you state that you discovered the alleged error or injustice in 2009, the Board concluded that you knew in 1976 that you had been discharged without entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07673-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ~ application on 6 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04410-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2009. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08551-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04188-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2009. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application. The evidence may pertain to the timeliness of your application or to its merits.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07595-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Presumably, your statements were taken into consideration at all levels of review, but on 9 October 2009, NPC recommended that you be honorably...