Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04188-08
Original file (04188-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ‘
JRE

Docket No. 04188-08
17 February 2009

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your

naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 5 February 2009. After careful consideration of
your application, the Board concluded that the portion of your
application pertaining to your correct rank on 23 May 1946 was
not timely filed, and that it. would not be in the interest of
justice for it to excuse your failure to submit your application
in a timely manner.

You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request
must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not
reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
The evidence may pertain to the timeliness of your application
or to its merits. Absent such additional evidence, further
review of your application is not possible.

The Board did not consider your request for correction of your
record to show that you were retired by reason of physical
disability in 1946 because there were no provisions of law for
the disability retirement of enlisted service members who were
released from active duty or discharged prior to 1 October 1949,
the effective date of the Career Compensation Act of 1949.
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely,

Dea!

W. DEAN PFE
Executive D or

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09177-07

    Original file (09177-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If you believe that you are still suffering from residual effects of the Reiter’s syndrome or any other condition that was incurred in or aggravated by your service in the Marine Corps, you should submit an application for disability benefits to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), which will expeditiously process your claims. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02115-03

    Original file (02115-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2003. The issue of your entitlement to compensation for illnesses or injuries you believe were incurred in or aggravated by your military service is a matter within the purview of the Department of Veterans Affairs, rather than the Department of the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11216-08

    Original file (11216-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09130-02

    Original file (09130-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 1942. You were transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 1 April 1961. completed the 20 years of qualifying service for eligibility for retired pay at age 60. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02621-03

    Original file (02621-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01187-04

    Original file (01187-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable materialThe Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 29 May 1946 at age 18. On 1 October 1948 you were convicted by deck...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001994

    Original file (20120001994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show his rank as staff sergeant. The applicant provides: * FSM's DD Form 214 for the period ending 29 February 1952 * FSM's Notice of Separation from U.S. The applicant's request for correction of the FSM's records to show his rank as staff sergeant and her contention that the FSM told her his rank was staff...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12111-08

    Original file (12111-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on i6 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00213-08

    Original file (00213-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02268-01

    Original file (02268-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. suspended on probation until 13 January 1949. received two nonjudicial punishments for disobedience, insolence and an unauthorized absence of one day. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...