DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 26370-5100
Docket. No: 5958-08
7 October 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the.
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Record, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 October 2009. After careful consideration of
your application, the Board concluded that your application was
not timely filed, and ‘that it would not be in the interest of
justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a
timely manner. The Board concluded that you were aware of the
alleged error or injustice in your record in 1984, when you were
discharged without entitlement to disability benefits
administered by the Department of the Navy.
You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request
must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not
reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
The evidence may pertain to the timeliness of your application
or to its merits. Absent such additional evidence, further
review of your application is not possible. The names and votes
of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Concerning the issue of the spelling of your last name on your
DD Form 214, you should contact Headquarters Marine Corps, MMSB
10, Quantico, VA.
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN 3
Executive Dire a
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05827-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 21 October 2009. Your request ‘must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not . The evidence may pertain to the timeliness of your application or to its merits.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02665-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07595-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Presumably, your statements were taken into consideration at all levels of review, but on 9 October 2009, NPC recommended that you be honorably...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07758-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09317-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2009. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02170-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval - Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 16 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11886-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2009. The Board concluded that your belated decision to request retention in the Navy Reserve in lieu of discharge, and to undergo elective knee surgery, are insufficient to demonstrate that you were improperly found unfit for duty by the PEB, or to warrant rescinding the orders that directed your discharge from the Navy Reserve. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02684-09
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing the contested fitness report. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09349-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, you received the following NUP’s: on 12 April 1961, for failure to obey a lawful order; on 22 May 1962, for UA; and on 24 September 1962, for UA. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00917-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted the psychological reports that you submitted with your application and the applicable regulations that require the assignment of...