Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01487-08
Original file (01487-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

HD:hd —
Docket No. 01487-08
28 March 2008

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

 
  

To: Secretary of the Navy
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 11 Feb 08 w/attachments

(2) PERS-311 memo dtd 14 Mar 08
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the fitness report for

16 September 2006 to 1 August 2007, a copy of which is at Tab A.

2. The Board, consisting of Mses. Humphrey and McCormick and
Mr. Blanchard, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 27 March 2008, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, ‘having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative -remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Navy

Personnel Command office having cognizance over the subject
matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to

the effect that her request has merit and warrants favorable
action.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and

especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the

following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
therefrom the following fitness report and related material:

Period of Report
Date of Report | Reporting Senior From To

 

227u107 ou USN 16Sep06 1Aug07

b. That there be inserted in Petitioner's naval record a
memorandum in place of the removed report, containing
appropriate identifying data concerning the report; that such
memorandum state that the report has been removed by order of
the Secretary of the Navy in accordance with the provisions of
federal law and may not be made available to selection boards
and other reviewing authorities; and that such boards may not
conjecture or draw any inference as to the nature of the report.

c. That appropriate corrections be made to the magnetic
tape or microfilm maintained by the Navy Personnel Command.

d. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

e. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and

complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of

Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

\ ens

W. DEAN PFEI
Executive Dir

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01174-08

    Original file (01174-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 1 February to 10 May 2006 (copy in enclosure (1)), 11 May 2006 to 31 January 2007 (copy at Tab A) and 1 February to 31 July 2007 (copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Humberd and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06556-08

    Original file (06556-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Guill and Messrs. McBride and Shy, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 August 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report and related material: Period of Report Date of Report Reporting Senior From To 2Aug07 10ct06 177u107 b. That there be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00874-08

    Original file (00874-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 May to 16 Jul 2006 and all related correspondence, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bowen, Dietrich and Morgan, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2008, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05725-08

    Original file (05725-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Petitioner contends the contested fitness report, in which she received the lowest marks of her 17-year career, was the result of bias against her on the part of the reporting senior (RS) “and may have even been gender related.” She asserts the RS never explained to her why he had marked her so low, when his comments would appear to support higher marks. e. Petitioner provided supporting statements from a chief warrant officer, a lieutenant colonel and a gunnery sergeant (enclosures (2)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11036-08

    Original file (11036-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 27 September to 7 December 2006 (copy at Tab A), and replacing it with a "not observed" report for the same period. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Ivins and Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2009, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00183-08

    Original file (00183-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Humphrey and Messrs. W. Hicks and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (3), Petitioner provided a confirmation of pregnancy dated 19 November 2007. f. In enclosure (4), OPNAV N135 again recommended denying Petitioner's request, as the pregnancy...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03781-08

    Original file (03781-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Bowen and Dunn, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 July 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05169-09

    Original file (05169-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 10 October 2007 to 30 March 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the following fitness report and related material: Period of Report From To 10 Oct 07 30 Mar 08 ‘Date of Report 17 Jul 08 b. e....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12104-08

    Original file (12104-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 16 September 2007 to 12 May 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. By enclosure (3), Petitioner requested reconsideration, specifically requesting modification of the report by removing, from block 41 (“Comments on Performance”), reference to the revocation of his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09822-10

    Original file (09822-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PERB took this action because Petitioner “submitted compelling evidence to indicate that the RO’s evaluation may have been biased and possibly influenced by factors other than the petitioner’s performance.” The PERB denied Petitioner’s request to remove the entire report, because it found the RS had provided him performance counseling, the RS's marks and comments did not indicate any bias or unfairness, and Petitioner had “failed to sufficiently establish his claim that the RS’ part of...