Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11036-08
Original file (11036-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

HD : hd
Docket No. 11036-08
9 January 2009

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

    

To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj : eee
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: DD Form 149 dtd 30 Oct 08 w/attachments

(1)
(2) Subject's e-mail dtd 5 Jan 09
(3) PERS-311 memo dtd 22 Dec 08
(4) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the fitness report for

27 September to 7 December 2006 (copy at Tab A), and replacing
it with a "not observed" report for the same period. By
enclosure (2), Petitioner amended her application to request
that the contested report be replaced by a memorandum of
continuity, rather than a "not observed" report.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Ivins and Rothlein,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

8 January 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the Navy
Personnel Command office having cognizance over fitness report
matters has recommended that the contested report be removed and
replaced by a memorandum of continuity.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (3), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
therefrom the following fitness report and related material:

Period of Report
Date of Report Reporting Senior . From To
27 Feb 07 ae irs 27 Sep 06 7 Dec 06

   

b. That there be inserted in Petitioner's naval record a
memorandum in place of the removed report containing appropriate
identifying data concerning the report; that the memorandum
state that the report has been removed by order of the Secretary
of the Navy in accordance with the provisions of federal law and
may not be made available to selection boards and other
reviewing authorities; and that such boards may not conjecture
or draw any inference as to the nature of the report.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

dad. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina

confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN

Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09639-07

    Original file (09639-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 12 September 2003 to 8 June 2004, a copy of which is at Tab A; removing her failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 06, 07 and 08 Line Captain Selection Boards; and granting her a special selection board for the FY 06 Line Captain...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 9639-07

    Original file (9639-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 12 September 2003 to 8 June 2004, a copy of which is at Tab A; removing her failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 06, 07 and 08 Line Captain Selection Boards; and granting her a special selection board for the FY 06 Line Captain...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09691-08

    Original file (09691-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 23 October 2006 to 31 January 2007, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Ms. LeBlanc and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 January 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09639-07

    Original file (09639-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In enclosure (6), the NPC office responsible for officer promotions has commented to the effect that since the fitness report in question is valid, Petitioner’s request for a special selection board has no merit. The documentation Petitioner provided at enclosure (3), especially the statistics, convinces the majority that Petitioner might well have deserved to be ranked above, rather than below, her peer in the contested fitness report. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04311-05

    Original file (04311-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 16 September to 12 November 2004 (copy at Tab A). By memorandum of 18 April 2005 (copy in enclosure (1)), the general court-martial authority (GCMA) concluded “the issue is moot” in light of Petitioner’s command’s message to the Navy Personnel Command (NPC),...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02276-08

    Original file (02276-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 November 2004 to 1 April 2005, a copy of which is at Tab A. d. Petitioner alleges that on 10 December 2004, the reporting senior assaulted his wife, and that the reporting senior then told Petitioner that if Petitioner reported the incident, he would ruin...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06602-08

    Original file (06602-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 June to 20 September 2007, a copy of which is at Tab A. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05725-08

    Original file (05725-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Petitioner contends the contested fitness report, in which she received the lowest marks of her 17-year career, was the result of bias against her on the part of the reporting senior (RS) “and may have even been gender related.” She asserts the RS never explained to her why he had marked her so low, when his comments would appear to support higher marks. e. Petitioner provided supporting statements from a chief warrant officer, a lieutenant colonel and a gunnery sergeant (enclosures (2)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06556-08

    Original file (06556-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Guill and Messrs. McBride and Shy, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 August 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report and related material: Period of Report Date of Report Reporting Senior From To 2Aug07 10ct06 177u107 b. That there be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00251-03

    Original file (00251-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Adams, Geisler and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 August 2003, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That NO memorandum be filed in Petitioner's naval record to replace the removed report, as this report is not needed for continuity. We recommend the report in question be removed fi-om the member's record.