Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11114-07
Original file (11114-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BAN
Docket No: 11114-07
2 September 2008

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

  

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OTeemig

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure
(1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her RE-4
reenlistment code be changed.

2. The Board, consisting of Messr Sin Stings and
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

13 August 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as

follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy in November 2001 and
served without disciplinary incident. On 12 March 2004, she was
issued a formal counseling/warning affording her the opportunity
to correct her known deficiencies for minor infractions. In
addition, on 3 June 2004, she was referred to the branch medical
clinic in Makalapa, Hawaii for observation and evaluation with
regard to an adjustment disorder. On 15 July 2004, she was
involuntarily separated from the naval service due to an
adjustment disorder with a general discharge characterization and
an RE-4 reenlistment code. An individual separated for this
reason is not recommended for reenlistment.

c. Pursuant to the Bureau of Naval Personnel (BuPers)
Instruction 1900.8A, a reenlistment code of RE-3G could be
assigned due to a condition not a disability, unless an RE-4 code
is warranted by the service record. In Petitioner’s case, her
RE-4 reenlistment code was not warranted based on her overall

evaluation average.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable

action.

The Board initially notes that Petitioner served without
disciplinary action, and that she was only separated by reason of
an adjustment disorder. The Board concludes that an RE-3G
reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance for
individuals who are separated by reason of an adjustment
disorder. Given her overall record, the Board further concludes

that an RE-3G reenlistment code is more appropriate than the RE-4
reenlistment code now of record.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing
the RE-4 reenlistment code, assigned on 15 July 2004, to
RE-3G.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed, or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's

naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of
this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file
maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a

part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN JN GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

™
e or

W. DEAN PF
Executive

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07905-07

    Original file (07905-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTiON OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100TJRDocket No: 7905-07 April 2008From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVI NAVAL RECORD OF___ -Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of her discharge be upgraded and her reenlistment code changed.2. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00208-08

    Original file (00208-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 00208-08 9 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF S22 paigestmer Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4339 13

    Original file (NR4339 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, to change her reentry code of RE-4 (not recommended for retention), which was issued on 19 October 2012. He was then recommended for administrative separation due to her diagnosed adjustment disorder. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 19 October 2012, she was issued an RE-3G reentry code...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08071-08

    Original file (08071-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 8071-08 23 January 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER Qe 206 REE. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 19 February 2008. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 17 March 2008, she was assigned a reentry code of RE-3G.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8153 13

    Original file (NR8153 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    gM reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. She received an uncharacterized entry level separation on 25 March 2011, with an RE-4 reentry code (not recommended for retention). That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that she received a reentry code of “RE-3G” vice “RE-4".

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1655 14

    Original file (NR1655 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Ms. Polk, and Mr. Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 July 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 2 September 2004, she was assigned an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 reentry code. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J. GEORGE Recorder Acting Recorder S. Pursuant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08474-09

    Original file (08474-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS | 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100CRS Docket No: 8474-09 24 August 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORME T

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10126-02

    Original file (10126-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS I 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 FC Document No: 10126- 02 28 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: EVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF iUmUINII~IIflIfhIhIIIIEUiIIiihhjUIhii~iiqimU~ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Petitioner’s conduct and overall trait averages were 3.25 and 3.2 respectively at the time of his discharge. Accordingly, the Board concludes that relief in the form...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00139-08

    Original file (00139-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 139-08 19 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of |the Navy Subj: FORMER sgeeul REVIEW OF NA AL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 lU.s.c. Pursuant to the Provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry |code she was assigned on 31 May 2006. That Petitioner’s naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03492-11

    Original file (03492-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 3492-11 30 January 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: ia OF NAVAL RECORD OF ess Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Mr. Pfeiffer and Mr. Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 January 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...