DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
TAL
Docket No: 3492-11
30 January 2012
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: ia OF NAVAL RECORD OF ess
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
(b) OPNAVINST 1160.5¢
Enel: (1) DD Form 149
{2} Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting a change in her RE-4 (not recommended for
retention) reentry code which was issued on 8 December 2008.
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Mr. Pfeiffer and Mr.
Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 19 January 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 6 May 2008. She
served without disciplinary incident. She received a National
Defense Service Medal and a Pistol Marksmanship Ribbon.
c. Petitioner received several medical evaluations after
experiencing chronic headaches; depression and loss of sleep.
She was diagnosed with dysmenorrheal migraine headaches, a
physical condition that rendered her unsuitable for continued
military service. She was recommended for administrative
separation. On 8 December 2008 she was discharged with an
honorable characterization and assigned a reentry code of RE-4.
d. The reenlistment code of RE-4 means that Petitioner is not
recommended for reenlistment. However, she could have been
assigned a code of RE-3G (condition not a disability), a
waiveable code.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action based upon her overall record of military service. The
Board therefore concludes that no useful purpose is served by |
assignment of the most restrictive reentry code of RE-4, and the
RE-3G code more accurately reflects the quality of her service.
In view of the above, the Board directs the following corrective
action.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
on 8 December 2008 she was issued an RE-3G reentry code vice the
RE-4 actually issued on that date.
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN | BRIAN \ oe
. Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6{e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
W. AL PEELE
Executive Diredior
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1655 14
The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Ms. Polk, and Mr. Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 July 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 2 September 2004, she was assigned an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 reentry code. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J. GEORGE Recorder Acting Recorder S. Pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00139-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 139-08 19 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of |the Navy Subj: FORMER sgeeul REVIEW OF NA AL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 lU.s.c. Pursuant to the Provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry |code she was assigned on 31 May 2006. That Petitioner’s naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03188-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 7 October 2008. The Board, consisting of Messrs. i, oi and —y, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 April 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08071-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 8071-08 23 January 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER Qe 206 REE. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 19 February 2008. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 17 March 2008, she was assigned a reentry code of RE-3G.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01820-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 1820-11 96 April 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy OF NAVAL RECORD ae Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 18 April 1995. Pfeiffer, Ivins, and Blanchard, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4339 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, to change her reentry code of RE-4 (not recommended for retention), which was issued on 19 October 2012. He was then recommended for administrative separation due to her diagnosed adjustment disorder. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 19 October 2012, she was issued an RE-3G reentry code...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8153 13
gM reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. She received an uncharacterized entry level separation on 25 March 2011, with an RE-4 reentry code (not recommended for retention). That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that she received a reentry code of “RE-3G” vice “RE-4".
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9270 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record reflect the reentry code of RE-3G (condition, not disability) vice RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) in block 27 of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued on 7 December 1999. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Rothlein, and Ms. Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01123 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record reflect a change in his reentry code issued on 22 May 1997, from RE-4 (not recommended for retention) to RE-3G condition (not physical disability) interfering with performance of duty in block 27 of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The Board, consisting of Mr. Lacroix,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6960 13
He was then recommended for administrative separation due to his diagnosed personality disorder. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting a change of Petitioner’s reentry code. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 9 April 2008, he was issued an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 now of record.