DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SMW
Docket No: 10666-07
31 July 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 30 July 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable
statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
On 3 September 1985, you enlisted in the Navy at age 19.
You then served without incident until 30 June and
2 September 1989, when you were counseled for having received
derogatory performance evaluations. On 2 September 1989, you
acknowledged a service record entry which stated that you were
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code because you were not
recommended for reenlistment. On 2 September 1989, you were
honorably released from active duty and assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code. On 14 July 1993, you were honorably
discharged from the Naval Reserve due to the expiration of your
obligated service.
Regulations direct the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
to members who are released from active duty and not
recommended for reenlistment. Since you have been treated no
differently than others in your situation, the Board could not
find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4
reenlistment code. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will
be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to
have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered
by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFRYF@E
Executive extor
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10666-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 3 September 1985, you enlisted in the Navy at age 19. On 2 September 1989, you were honorably...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02623-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02605-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03128-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. concluded that a 33 day period of unauthorized absence was sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11295-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05950-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07845-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 20 October 1977 at age 20, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03743-08
During the period from 26 June. The Board also considered the medical documentation submitted in support of your case. It also appears that your fraud continued when you enlisted in the Army National Guard by obtaining a waiver of your physical disability while serving in the Marine Corps and, by omission of your service in the Navy, which included the diagnosis of a severe personality disorder and nonrecommendation for reenlistment, both resulting in the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02329-08
A-three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Records, sitting in executive session, considered y application on 18 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Boay your application, together with all material submit thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes and policies. After review, the separation autho an entry level separation by reason of entry level and conduct and you were so separated on 2 Februar that time you were not recommended for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05713-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.