Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02329-08
Original file (02329-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX TRG
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

Docket

No: 2329-08

20 November 2008

 

This is in reference to your application for corred
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 1d
States Code section 1552.

A-three-member panel of the Board for Correction of

Records, sitting in executive session, considered y
application on 18 November 2008. Your allegations
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administ
regulations and procedures applicable to the procee
Board. Documentary material considered by the Boay
your application, together with all material submit
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes
and policies.

rtion of your
of the United

Naval

rour

of error and
Lrative

Pdings of this
rd consisted of
tted in support
regulations

 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire

record, the Board found that the evidence submitte
insufficient to establish the existence of probabl
error or injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 29 August 1988 at age

three months of service in the Delayed Entry Progr
January 1989 a Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report was s
indicated that you were abusing alcohol more than

week. On 23 January 1989 you acknowledged that yo
evaluated and found to be physiologically and psyc
dependent on alcohol. Based on this evaluation, y
processed for an administrative separation. At th
waived your procedural rights and stated that you

to separation. After review, the separation autho
an entry level separation by reason of entry level
and conduct and you were so separated on 2 Februar

that time you were not recommended for reenlistment

assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.

Regulations allowed for the assignment of an RE-4

code when an individual was separated due to entry
performance and conduct. As indicated, the actual
your separation was your diagnosed alcohol dependey
Individuals separated for that reason are normally
RE-4 reenlistment code. Therefore, the Board conc]

 

luded that

was
material

18 after about

m. On 20
bmitted which
our times a
had been
ologically
u were
t time, you
id not object
ity directed
performance
1989. At
and were

reenlistment

level
reason for

ie

assigned an
the

RE-4 reenlistment code was properly assigned and no change is

warranted. |
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official |records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your tied are such that

Sincerely,

1
oa ; p
. ~N ~~.
W. DEAN TRRER \.
Executive \Di tor

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12182-08

    Original file (12182-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded, however, that as the assignment of a reentry code of RE-4 is required when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct, there is no basis for any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05725-09

    Original file (05725-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 23 January 1989, you refused to participate in the Level I and II programs and signed a written statement which said in part, that you consented to being administratively separated for alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure. Finally, an RE-4 reenlistment code must be assigned to all...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03126-02

    Original file (03126-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The record reflects that on 30 March 1990 you received You reported to active duty on 18 April On 7 February 1991 the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an honorable discharge by reason of alcohol...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02243-08

    Original file (02243-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Given your diagnoses that resulted in discharge after about three months of active service and since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the entry level separation or assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00546-10

    Original file (00546-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2010. However, the SARP at Corpus Christi Hospital and your command Drug and Alcohol Program Assistant (DAPA) Ggtermined that you were an alcohol rehabilitation failure and it was recommended that you be separated for not complying with the Peonmended treatment. On 27 February 2008, your case was heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB), which...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09184-07

    Original file (09184-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. It also considered your assertion that your misconduct, discharge, and reenlistment code were the result of your abuse of alcohol.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03975-07

    Original file (03975-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 21 November 1989. Since you have been treated no...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04620-07

    Original file (04620-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 7 February 2007 at age 21. As a result, you were processed for an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00787-03

    Original file (00787-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08244-98

    Original file (08244-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 September 1989 you were diagnosed with a severe borderline personality disorder which existed prior to enlistment (EPTE) and alcohol abuse. Further, the Board noted that even though you had been warned of Given an administrative separation, the Board concluded that your all the circumstances of your case, discharge, narrative reason for separation, and reenlistment code were proper and no change is warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...