Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09322-07
Original file (09322-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 SMW
 Docket No: 9322-07
30 May 2008



This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-me mb er panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
On 7 September 1990, you enlisted in the Naval Reserve at age
 18.      On 25 October 1990, you began a period of active service. On 9 January 1991, you received a psychiatric evaluation during which you expressed suicidal ideation and stated that you could not adjust to being around a lot of people or being ordered around. The evaluation diagnosed you as having an adjustment disorder and concluded by recommending administrative separation. On 14 January 1991, your commanding officer initiated an entry level separation by reason of entry level performance and conduct. In connection with this processing, you acknowledged the separation action and did not object to discharge. On 30 January 1991, the separation authority approved the recommendation and directed an entry level separation by reason of entry level performance and conduct. On 5 February 1991, you were so discharged and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
 Regulations direct the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged due to entry level performance and conduct or are considered a threat to harm themselves or others if retained. Since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE—4 reenlistment code. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,



W. DEAN PFEIFFER
 Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03893-07

    Original file (03893-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 23 April 1991 at age 18. on 24 April 1991 you were referred for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03096-09

    Original file (03096-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05384-06

    Original file (05384-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 January 1989 at age 18. On 12 March 1991 you received NJP for this...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08277-98

    Original file (08277-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the entry level The Board also noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code Further, the Board concluded that since you submitted no evidence that you were incorrectly diagnosed as having a personality disorder, there is no basis to change the reason for your separation. thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01883-02

    Original file (01883-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01944-07

    Original file (01944-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 3 October 1988, you enlisted in the Navy at age 17 with parental consent. On 4 March 1991, you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07705-07

    Original file (07705-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations, and policies. At this time you were not recommended for retention or reenlistment, and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code because of your failure to complete basic training due to your lack...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07580-05

    Original file (07580-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 12 June 1986 and served in an active status until 23 May 1991...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08074-08

    Original file (08074-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2009. Your record reflects that on 9 February you received counselling due to an alcohol related incident on 26 January 1990 and were subsequently assigned to a Level I rehabilitation program on 1 February 1990. The next day you received counselling for alcohol rehabilitation failure.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06181-98

    Original file (06181-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 1999. On 20 January 1998 the separation Regulations require the assignment of an when an individual is separated because of entry level RR-4 reenlistment code performance and conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.