DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Y
S
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No: 1883-02
11 July 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 July 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record
and policies.
*and applicable statutes, regulations
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 30 March 2000 at age 19.
Subsequently, you were referred for a psychiatric evaluation
after you exhibited depressive symptoms associated with the
military environment.
The weapons department to which you were
assigned stated that you wouldn't work, and sat around and cried.
On 31 July 2000 you were diagnosed with an adjustment disorder
and were recommended for an administrative separation.
\'physical or mental
On 9 August 2000 you were notified of separation processing by
reason of
performance of your duties".
you elected to waive your procedural rights.
On 25 September
2000 the separation authority directed an entry level separation
and you were so separated on 15 September 2000.
conditions" interfering with the
In connection with this processing,
In your application you state that your adjustment problems
occurred because you were upset about the terminal illness of
your stepmother.
You have submitted a death certificate that
shows she died on 11 August 2002.
However, you told the Navy
psychologist that you were raised by your natural mother and had
never lived away from home, and did not mention the illness of
your stepmother.
Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
in cases such as yours, and such a code is normally assigned when
an individual cannot adjust to military service.
concluded that you were properly discharged based on the
Since you have been treated no
diagnosed adjustment disorder.
differently than others separated within the first six months of
service, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the
assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
The Board
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07609-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Further, the Board could not tell if you The Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated by reason of erroneous enlistment and such a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03502-02
discharge by reason of personality disorder, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Enclosed is a DD Form 293, which you may use However, it cannot change a NDRB is Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02355-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05703-00
e. SF 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 30 July 97, Mental Health Department, Naval Hospital Oak Harbor, documenting on Axis I: Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood, Dysthymia, and on Axis II: Dependent and Avoidant Traits 3. Review of the service record revealed: entered the service on 18 August 94 in Portland, Oregon. There is no evidence of a mental illness present at the time of separation that rendered the service member disabled or unlit for increased risk of suicide...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08506-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03990-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found no evidence that the diagnosis of adjustment disorder was incorrect. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5317 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. However, the Board concluded that you were correctly assigned the RE-4 reentry code in light of your misconduct, personality disorder, and non-recommendation for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07326-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 14 May 1997, you enlisted in the Navy at age 20. On 30 November 2000, you received a psychiatric...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03279-01
Concerning your abuse of alcohol you stated that It was also noted that you had previously been diagnosed The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 May 2000 at age 22. Based on the foregoing record, administrative separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment, a and alcohol abuse rehabilitation designated mental condition, Subsequently, the separation authority directed an failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08319-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 3 June 1999 at age 18. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors...