Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02852-06
Original file (02852-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
        DEPART ENTOFTHE NAVY
         BOARD FOR COR ECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
         2 NAVY ANNEX
         WASHIN TON DC 20370-5100


 MEH
 Docket No. 2852-06
29 Mar 2007





This is in reference to your app lication for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Boa d for Correction of Naval Records, s itting in executive session, con sidered your application on 29 March 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 06U0648 of 10 Nov 06, and NMPC m ma 7220 Pers-401l of 24 Jan 07, copies of which are attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, he Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the ad v isory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously c o nsidered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to k eep in mind that a presumption o f regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an o fficial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate he existence of probable material error or injustice.
         

        
         Sincerely,      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05882-06

    Original file (05882-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/06U066l of 10 Nov 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10667-06

    Original file (10667-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 07U0146 of 16 Feb 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07213-06

    Original file (07213-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENTOF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORR CTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 AVY ANNEX WASHING ON DC 20370-5100MEH Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consist d of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulation and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 Nl3ODl/Ser 07U0l25 of 9 Feb 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06496-06

    Original file (06496-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6496-06 29 Mar 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 0 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08904-06

    Original file (08904-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORR CTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 AVY ANNEX WASHING ON DC 20370-5100MEH Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion finished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/07U0042 of 23 Jan 07, a co y of which is attached.After careful and conscientious...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01938-06

    Original file (01938-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 06U0739 of 28 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10396-06

    Original file (10396-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10396-06 29 Mar 07This is in reference to your applicant on for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 0 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07869-06

    Original file (07869-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYOFFiCE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08269-06

    Original file (08269-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser Nl3oc4/o6u0751, 29 December 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02804-06

    Original file (02804-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO 7220 Ser N130c4/06u0260, 21 April 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...