Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10889-06
Original file (10889-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
                           DEPARTMEN OF THE NAVY
 BOARD FOR CORREC ION OF NAVAL RECORDS
          2 NA VY ANNEX
                                     WASHINGTO DC 20370-5100


DJC
 Docket No. 10889-06
21 March 2007




This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions f 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board or Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, con si dered your application on 20 March 2007. Your allegations o error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of t is Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted f your application, together with all material submitted in support hereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations a d policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 4811/093 dtd 26 Feb 07, a copy of w hich is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes f the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. Y ou are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in m in d that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.







Sincerely,

W.       DEAN PFIEFFER






Enclosure
DEPARTME T OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERS NNEL COMMAND
5720 INT GRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
1160
 Ser 4811/093
26 Feb 2007
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Via:     PERS-31C
Subj:    BCNR PETITION ICO
Ref:     (a) SNM’S DD Form 149 dtd 28 Nov 06
 (b)      NAVADMIN 1160-040
End:     (1) BCNR File
1.       In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request.
2.       The petitioner enlisted in the Navy for four years on 09 January 2003. The petitioner signed a 12 months NAVPERS 1070/621 extension on 13 February 2003 to establish eligibility for the Enlistment Bonus
 (EB). The petitioner signed a NAVPERS 1070/613 agreeing to accept assignment to the MA/SG program and EB. This established an EAOS of 08 January 2007 with an extended EAOS of 08 January 2008. The member
 requests to adjust cancel the extension agreement.
3.       Reference (b) authorizes cancellation of extension provided member does not receive benefits for which the extension was executed. The member received the EB and received training in the MA rating.
4.       In view of the above recommend no change to the petitioner’s record.
5.       This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is returned.

ETC(SW/AW) USN
 Reenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04793-06

    Original file (04793-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests SRB eligible reenlistment effective 20 April 2006 and receive the zone “C” SRB offered in reference (b) The petitioner is ineligible for the zone “C” SRB entitlement. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05233-06

    Original file (05233-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. The petitioner’s SRB payment was based on 60-month reenlistment term minus obligated service between reenlistment and EAOS.5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00311-07

    Original file (00311-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    311-07 14 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.ncerely,W. This is an advisory...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10360-02

    Original file (10360-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06563-06

    Original file (06563-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 4811/561 dtd 21 Sep 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05924-06

    Original file (05924-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/028 dated 18 Jan 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09553-06

    Original file (09553-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/730 dtd 18 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08740-06

    Original file (08740-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (b) did not provide an SRB award level for the ENrate at the time of the member’s reenlistment.3. Therefore the petitioner could not have been counseled concerning reference (c) prior to the reenlistment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05600-09

    Original file (05600-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05392-06

    Original file (05392-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Reference (c) provided a zone “A” SRB for NEC 8483 at the time the petitioner received orders to NEC 8483 training. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.