Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09553-06
Original file (09553-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
-        WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


DJC
 Docket No. 9553-06
24 January 2007

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/730 dtd 18 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be~ furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.


Sincerely,


         ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
 Acting Executive Director
 Enclosure






DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
                                             MILLINGTON TN 38055~000O
          -       

                                                      1160 -
                                    Ser 4811/730
         18 Dec 2006
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Via:     PERS-31C
         Subj

Ref:     (a) SNM’S DD Form 149 dtd 26 Oct 06
                   (b) OPNAVINST 1160.6A
End:     (1) BCNR File
1.       In response to reference (a), recommend no change the petitioner’s request.
2.       The member reenlisted for six years on 20 October 2006 and received 14 months zone “C” SRB payment. The petitioner’s EAOS at the time of r eenlistment was 29 September 2007. The member requests 16 months total SRB payment for zone “C” entitlement.
3.       Reference (b) zone “C” SRB computation is based on OBLISERV remaining on the current enlistment for which SRB cannot be paid, a fraction of a month will be rounded up to the next whole month. For example: the member’s time remaining prior to reenlistment was 11 months and nine days, the period for which SRB is paid will be deducted by 12 months. Additionally, OBLISERVE beyond 16 years total military service may not be used to compute SRB. The petitioner received the correct total SRB payment.
4.       This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is returned.


ETC(SW/AW) USN
Reenlistment Incentives Branch

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06397-06

    Original file (06397-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (d) provided a zone “A” SRB award level of 1.5 for the PR rate at the time of the member’s reenlistment. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03669-06

    Original file (03669-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/743 dtd 21 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00658-04

    Original file (00658-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner passed through the zone “A” SRB window on 22 January 1998. The petitioner requests to backdate the 18 May 1998 reenlistment contract to 22 January 1998 and receive the zone “A” SRB offered in reference (b) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02967-07

    Original file (02967-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.W. The member requests the full 48 months SRB based on the OTT reenlistment authorization. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05233-06

    Original file (05233-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. The petitioner’s SRB payment was based on 60-month reenlistment term minus obligated service between reenlistment and EAOS.5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05392-06

    Original file (05392-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Reference (c) provided a zone “A” SRB for NEC 8483 at the time the petitioner received orders to NEC 8483 training. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10535-06

    Original file (10535-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Leeman, and Mr. Chapman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on •24 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06544-06

    Original file (06544-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Washington, Chapman, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00311-07

    Original file (00311-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    311-07 14 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.ncerely,W. This is an advisory...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05840-06

    Original file (05840-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...