Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09101-06
Original file (09101-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 LCC
 Docket No. 9101-06
11 Jan 07


This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.
A three—member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CM C memorandum 1400/3 MMPR-2, 20 November 2006, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,

ROBERT D. Z SALMAN
 Acting Executive Director
 Enclosure







DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
                           HARRY LEE HALL, 17 LEJEUNE ROAD        
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134.5104
                                                      
                                                               IN REPLY REFER TO:
                   1400 / 3
                                                                                  MMPR-2
                                                                                           20 Oct 20 06


MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:    ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF STAFF SERGEANT


Ref:     (a) BCNR Docket Number 9101-06 of 13 Oct 06
(b) MCO P1400.32D, ENLPROMMAN

 1. Per reference (a) r equests remedial promotion to gunnery sergeant for the CY 1999 Reserve Staff Noncommissioned Officer (SNCO) Selection Board in the Active Reserve (AR) component. r equest is based on his Armed Forces Active Duty Base Date (AFADBD) being corrected in the Marine Corps Total Force (MCTFS) in July 2005 to reflect April 5, 1985. asserts that his AFADED adjustment would have made him eligible for promotion consideration for the CY 1999 Reserve SNCO Selection Board AR.
2.       A review of records found that he was eligible for promotion consideration by the CY 1999 and 2000 Reserve SNCO Selection Board AR in the below zone (BZ). Paragraph 3602.5m of reference (b) states that there is no entitlement to remedial consideration for Marines who were considered for promotion selection by their respective boards in the below zone. Subsequently, was properly considered for promotion selection by the CY 2001 Reserve SNCO Selection Board AR in the promotion zone (IZ) and by the FY 2004 and FY 2005 Reserve SNCO Selection Boards in the above zone (AZ), but was not selected to the next higher grade.
3.       request does not satisfy the criteria contained in paragraph 3602 of reference (b) Accordingly, his request for remedial promotion consideration is denied.

Major, U.S. Marine Corps
Head, Enlisted Promotion Section

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07469-00

    Original file (07469-00.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 29 November 2000 and 2 January 2001, copies of which are attached. 2 Subj: ~ GUNNERY SERGEANT U~IIIIhIUBCR f. Gunnery Sergean rovides a statement in support of his request for removal of’ ‘the page 11 entry. g. Gunnery Sergean rovides documentation, a copy of a personal award, the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal he received to support his request for removal of the page 11 entry.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01685-06

    Original file (01685-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the alternative, you now request new enlisted remedial selection boards (ERSB’s) for the Calendar Year (CY) 1999, 2000 and 2001 master sergeant and first sergeant selection boards.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. The Board found the ~Th’IPR-2 advisory opinion dated 2 August 2006 was correct as to the number of Marines with whom you were compared, despite the indications, in the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00603-03

    Original file (00603-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05425-01

    Original file (05425-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records indicate that b. Board for Correction of Naval Records for remedial consideration for promotion. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner will be given remedial consideration for paygrade E-8 for CY 98 and CY 99 by the Active promotion to Reserve Staff Noncommissioned Officer Selection Board.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03326-06

    Original file (03326-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400/3 MMPR-2, 12 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04454-02

    Original file (04454-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07908-01

    Original file (07908-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of with all subnlitted in support thereof, your naval record and II addition, the Board considered the advisory I I~~~I~~oI-;II~~~~II~~ 140013 MMPR 2 of 13 November 2001, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01187-99

    Original file (01187-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    authoriz s been 344 days of became eligible for promotion to Selected Marine Corps Reserve (SMCR) promotion board however, was not selected due to keen 1993 selection message. selected for promotion by any of the boards who considered his record. Head, Reserve Affairs Personnel Management Branch Reserve Affairs Division By direction r DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT HARRY LEE HALL, QUANTICO, VIRGINIA I7 LEJEUNE...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01285-00

    Original file (01285-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    We have reviewed the subject application and cannot support Major equest for removal of failures of selection (FOS) status with provision of the following opinions: While the Marine Corps Reserve Support Command (MCRSC) s stated that his failure to receive igibility for promotion consideration by the a. Ma notificat FY99 Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Promotion Board adversely impacted the timeliness of his submission and was instrumental in his subsequent non-selection. (b) makes it clear that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03192-06

    Original file (03192-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 7 June 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...