KIEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
LCC:lc
Docket No. 5425-01
4 October 2001
From:
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Ref:
Encl:
(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
(1)
(2)
(3)
DD Form 149 w/attachments
HQMC
HQMC
1420/2 MMPR-2 of 22 Jun 01
1400/3 MMPR-2 of 10 Aug 01
ltr
ltr
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), subject,
1.
hereinafter, referred to as Petitioner,
this Board requesting, in effect,
record be corrected to show she is entitled to remedial
consideration for promotion to
paygrade E-8.
that the applicable naval
filed enclosure (1) with
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Pfeiffer, and
2.
Whitener reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 2 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by
The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
3 .
to Petitioner's allegations of error and justice, finds as
follows:
a.
Petitioner's Military Occupation Specialty (MOS) 6054, a
feeder MOS to MOS 6019 was inadvertently omitted from the list of
MOS's which would be considered for promotion during the planning
process for CY 1998 and 1999 Reserve Staff Noncommissioned
Officer (SNCO) selection boards.
Petitioner was the only Marine in the Active Reserve Program
holding the 6054 MOS as a primary MOS.
Records indicate that
b.
In 1998 Petitioner received her Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) certification as an airframes and
powerplants mechanic, which authorized her to work on all
aircraft in the Marine Corps inventory including the A6 Intruder
and the F18 Hornet.
Docket No. 5425-01
C .
In 1997 Petitioner was not considered for promotion when
the regular promotion board met.
(HQMC) told her she did not have a career path as a 6054 and was
After the CY 1997 board results were released
wasting her time.
she was able to convince HQMC of her eligibility for
consideration for promotion.
consideration for promotion to
She was then given remedial
paygrade E-8 but was not selected.
Headquarters Marine Corps
d.
When the promotion messages for CY 1998 and CY
1999 were
released her MOS was once again omitted as a feeder MOS for 6019.
Petitioner's efforts to convince HQMC that she was eligible for
the CY 1997, although successful in CY 1997, were forgotten by
the time the CY 1998 and CY 1999 boards met.
on being considered for E-8 and submitted her request to be
transferred to the Fleet Reserve.
1998 promotion board had 5 allocations and returned an
one for which she was never even considered.
Then she learned that the CY
rlemptytl
Petitioner gave up
e.
Petitioner received encouragement from an active duty
She submitted a request to HQMC MMPR-2 in June 2001
sergeant major to pursue her right to be considered for
promotion.
for remedial consideration and her request was denied because
she was not on active duty.
HQMC MMPR-2 in their letter of
22 June 2001 at enclosure
eligible for consideration,
administrative error.
the Marine Corps she was not eligible for remedial promotion
consideration.
Board for Correction of Naval Records for remedial consideration
for promotion.
MMPR-2 recommended that she submit a petition the
(Z), informed her that she had been
but was not considered due to an
since she had retired from
Additionally
f.
In correspondence attached as enclosure
having cognizance over the subject matter involved in
Petitioner's application recommended denial, commenting that
since she had retired from the Marine Corps she was not eligible
for remedial consideration for promotion
(3),
the.office
CONCLUSION:
In this connection, the Board finds that since
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
notwithstanding the comments contained in enclosure
Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
requested relief.
Petitioner was eligible for consideration for promotion to
paygrade E-8 and was not considered due to an administrative
error that she should be considered through the remedial board
MMPR-2 has the obligation to consider that each and
process.
every Marine on active duty eligible for promotion is considered.
When a Marine is not considered due to an administrative error
then he/she is entitled to remedial consideration for promotion.
(3), the
Docket No. 5425-01
Even though Petitioner has now retired she was on active duty
when the board met and should have been considered for promotion
by a remedial board.
Accordingly, the Board recommends the following corrective
action.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
to show that:
a.
Petitioner will be given remedial consideration for
paygrade E-8 for CY 98 and CY 99 by the Active
promotion to
Reserve Staff Noncommissioned Officer Selection Board.
In the event Petitioner is a selectee to
paygrade E-8 by
b.
the remedial board, either CY 98 or CY 99, her record will be
corrected to show the two years she would normally be required to
serve on active duty following the effective date of the
promotion was waived by the appropriate Naval authorities and her
transfer to the Marine Corps Retired List was in
paygrade E-8.
It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
4.
and that the foregoing is a true and
review and deliberations,
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
.- L. ADAMS
G
Acting Recorder
The foregoing action of
5.
review and action.
t‘he Board is submitted for your
Reviewed and approved:
DEC
- 5 200
1
d
wwEPHG. H
Assistant General Counsel
(Manpower And Reserve Affairs)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05603-01
e. Petitioner was subsequently considered for promotion to paygrade E-4 and paygrade E-5 with a corrected date of rank in was promoted to paygrade E-5 effective 1 December 2000. f. Petitioner believes that since she was promised that she could reenlist with her original date of rank of 1 June 1997 and all her enlistment processing documents were completed reflecting the original date of rank and it was entered into the Marine Corps mechanized system that the date of rank should not have been...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06522-99
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) DD Form 149 w/attachments Ltr of 22 Jul 97 to President of FY 97 Staff Sergeant Promotion Board Request of 20 Jan 98 to expunge fitness report CMC ltr of 3 Apr 98 approving the removal of fitness report Request to extend on active duty for remedial promotion consideration and denial Ltr of Apr 98 requesting remedial promotion consideration and denial CMC MMPR-2 memo of 10 Jan 00 Microfiche Records Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), subject, that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01685-06
In the alternative, you now request new enlisted remedial selection boards (ERSB’s) for the Calendar Year (CY) 1999, 2000 and 2001 master sergeant and first sergeant selection boards.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. The Board found the ~Th’IPR-2 advisory opinion dated 2 August 2006 was correct as to the number of Marines with whom you were compared, despite the indications, in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04798-02
"in zone" population, two opportunity for promotion may g. USMC, RAP-36, the office responsible for establishing the promotion criteria for the active reserve master sergeants recommended that the each Marine erroneously considered in the "below enclosure (2). MC0 j. Petitioner then submitted a request to the Board for Correction of Naval Records requesting consideration for promotion to E-8 before an Enlisted Remedial Selection Board alleging that he was only given a 41.6% opportunity when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07166-01
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removal of the contested fitness report for 1 January to 2 February 1996. The Board also considered your rebuttal letter dated 30 July 2002 with enclosures.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.In concluding that no further correction to your fitness report record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08229-01
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner and Rothlein and Ms. Schnittman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 January 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) removed 1996 weight control entries relating to Petitioner from the Marine Corps Total Force System after he had been considered and not selected by the CY 1999 and not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01350-02
Consequently, he was never given the His detaching fitness report was below d. If a response to the adverse fitness report had been on file when the promotion board first reviewed his records for consideration for promotion to gunnery sergeant in CY 2000 his comments and the fitness report would have been reviewed at the same time, enclosure (2). g- The CY 2001 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board convened on 24 April 2001, prior to the date that the Performance Evaluation Review Board reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02818-99
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing his NJP of 9 January 1997. b. In light of this Board's decision to remove the contested NJP, that Petitioner's application, to be forwarded by this Board, be returned to the HQMC PERB, as agreed to in enclosure (2), for action on his request to correct his fitness report record. Naval Board of Correction of Military Records has jurisdiction to consider whether a former serviceman's military record should be corrected if it is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08696-00
1552 (1) (2) (3) (4) DD Form 149 w/attachments E-mail from CMC memo Petitioner's Microfiche MSgt Hull, Career Counselor 1400/3, MMPR-2, 12 Feb 01 filed enclosure (1) with that the applicable naval paygrade E-8 for the CY96 Active Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), subject, 1. hereinafter, referred to as Petitioner, this Board requesting, in effect, record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to remedial promotion consideration to Reserve (AR) Staff Noncommissioned Officer...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09317-02
9317-02 21 August 2003 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Review of naval record (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Marines considered for promotion for the CY 2001 Reserve Staff Noncommissioned Officer Selection Board were given only a 41.6% promotion opportunity when the Marine Corps guidelines guarantee a minimum of 60% opportunity for promotion to E-8. Inflation of the promotion zone is not listed as one of the reasons for remedial promotion nevertheless when...