Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06378-06
Original file (06378-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                                             BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                                              
2 NAVY ANNEX
                                                      WASHINGTON DC 20370~5I 00



JRE
Docket No. 06378-06
2 July 2007
        

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

The Board found that on 26 September 2003, the Physical Evaluation Board determined that you were unfit for duty by reason of left sural nerve entrapment, which it rated at 20% under Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) code 8623. You rejected that finding, and demanded a formal hearing, at which you that you be assigned ratings for a scar on your left ankle, and an injury to a lingual nerve. The hearing panel of the PEE confirmed the 20% rating under VA code 8623, and declined to rate the scar and lingual nerve injury. On 22 January 2004, the Director, Naval Council of Personnel Boards, denied your request for relief from final action of the PEE. You were discharged with entitlement to disability severance pay effective 29 February 2004. On 1 May 2006, the VA awarded you a 30% rating for the injury to the lingual nerve, 20% for sural nerve entrapment syndrome, and 0% for a left ankle scar.

The Board concluded that the rating action taken by the VA on 1 May 2006 is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your case. In this regard, it noted that the VA assigns disability ratings without regard to the issue of fitness for military duty. As you have not demonstrated that the lingual nerve injury and ankle scar were unfitting conditions, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,




                                                                        W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01155

    Original file (PD-2013-01155.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “sural nerve entrapment syndrome, left intractable”as unfitting, rated 20%, with likely application of theVA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI appealed to the Formal PEB (FPEB) with a petition to include the ankle scar and loss of tongue sensation. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20030926VA -based on Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Sural Nerve...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00281

    Original file (PD2009-00281.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA rated it using the code for ankle, limited range-of-motion (ROM) and rated the nerve condition separately as well. The Left Sural Nerve Neuralgia was not documented prior to second surgery (tendon repair) and the CI was not referred to the PEB until after he had left foot pain in addition to his left ankle pain. The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating XXXXXXXXXX be corrected to show that the diagnoses in his finding of unfitness were Chronic Left...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00429

    Original file (PD2009-00429.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Examinations from May 2005 by a civilian neurologist show difficulty with right foot dorsiflexion, a lot of pain laterally on the leg from the knee down, especially on the foot with any tactile stimuli or with movement. The VA rated the CI’s disability under a peripheral neuropathy code but included the functional motor loss and therefore was not limited to rating the disability at the moderate level. The CI had motor weakness most likely due to pain documented on multiple examinations as...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02247

    Original file (PD-2013-02247.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20070430 Members agreed that the evidence supports a 20% rating for Group XI moderately severe muscle disability due to cardinal signs and symptoms of muscle disability of marked muscle atrophy, loss of soft tissue, and weakness on examination and lowered threshold of fatigue, fatigue-pain, and uncertainty of movement/incoordination with repetitive ROM or extended standing and walking, and loss of power due to posterior scar tissue.The Board again considered the normal gait...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00745

    Original file (PD2011-00745.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was then medically separated with a 10% disability rating. Pain Left Foot Condition . All evidence considered, there is not a preponderance of the evidence in the CI’s favor supporting addition of the left ankle condition as an unfitting condition for separation rating.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00017

    Original file (PD2009-00017.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA only rated the tibial nerve (8624) and this ignored the problem in the 1 distribution area of the common peroneal nerve (8621) and the sural nerve. While there is no rule that prohibits rating more than one peripheral nerve, this CI has a condition, RSD, that involves multiple nerves and it is appropriate to rate the overall condition, not the individual nerve injuries that comprise the condition. Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy, Left Ankle, rated as Neuritis, Severe Incomplete...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01387

    Original file (PD-2013-01387.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    (2).It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Posttraumatic Arthritis, Left Knee, Secondary to Gunshot Wound (GSW)501010%Residual of GSW to the Left Knee withTraumatic Arthritis and Partial Left Saphenous andSural Nerve Injuries531130%20050627Scars, Residual...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01873

    Original file (PD-2014-01873.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. RATING COMPARISON : Service FPEB – Dated 20071127VA* - Based on Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain Left Foot, Possibly Secondary to Sural Neuralgia8799-872510%Left Ankle Condition, Status Post Brostrom Surgery52710%STRSural...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02349

    Original file (PD-2013-02349.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was not appropriate under the guidelines...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00444

    Original file (PD 2012 00444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the right ankle pain; common peroneal partial neuritis, moderate condition as unfitting, rated 20%. The PEB rated that at 0%. However, the unfitting condition was right ankle pain a separate rating would be based on the same impairment used to adjudicate a rating under the nerve code used by the PEB and is prohibited by §4.14 (Avoidance of pyramiding).