Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05060-06
Original file (05060-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 BJG
 Docket No:5060-06
 7 September 2006


This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 September 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from the Marine Corps Recruiting Command, dated 13 July 2006, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. The Board recognized that the commanding officer who recommended your relief for the good of the service now supports removing from your record all documentation of that relief. In view of the above, your application has been denied. The names and
                   votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.















It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.


Sincerely,



         W.       DEAN PFEIFFER
 Executive Director
 .


Enclosure





























UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS RECRUITING COMMAND
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VA 22134-5103



                                                                                          1610 G-l
                                                                                           JUL 1 3 2006



MEMORANDUM FOR THE       EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF STAFF

Ref:     (a) MCO 1130.80A
1.       We were asked to provide an advisory opinion on Staff Sergeant
 re quest to have his relief for the good of service removed from his OMPF.
2.       Per the reference and review of the attached OMPF, there is not enough evidence to support the removal of this information. A good of service relief from recruiting duty is not grounds for non-selection to warrant officer. The information stated in the OMPF is factual. Marine Corps Recruitin g a nd recommends that this information remain in Staff Sergean t , PF.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07499-01

    Original file (07499-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 January 2002. Staff Sergeant application with supporting documents has been ncerning his request for removal of the sensitive medical documentation contained in his official military personnel files (OMPF). Staff medical documentation contained in his OMPF.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09018-02

    Original file (09018-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE DEPARTMENT OF THE 3280 RUSSELL ROAD VIRQINIA QUANTICO, 22134-5103 NAVY CORPS IN REPLY REFER TO: 1070 MIFD IIEC 3 Z@ MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: F STAFF...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05797-01

    Original file (05797-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Marine Corps Recruiting Command, dated 31 August 2001, a copy of which is attached, and your letter dated 17 October 2001 with enclosures. The Board was unable to find anything misleading, inaccurate or gratuitous about the statements in paragraph 2 of the contested request dated 23 September 1998 for your relief from recruiting duty for the good of the service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00379-02

    Original file (00379-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested removal of your fitness reports for 1 March to 28 August 1998 and 1 October to 14 November 1998, as well as documentation of your relief for the good of the service from recruiting duty. ” CMC also “Recruited SNM was put on bed rest/no duty due to pregnancy problems/back problems. (2), the approval authority (GOS) relief from recruiting duty, has supports her request for Additionally, enclosure Based upon this review, 2. following errors require corrective action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06062-07

    Original file (06062-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 14 August 2007, a copy of which is attached. You requested an advisory opinion on the revocation of Staff Sergeant Valdez’s (hereinafter “Applicant”) appointment to the grade of Gunnery Sergeant and the removal of a charge he received at Battalion level Non-Judicial Punishment (NUP) . On 3 May 2007, the Commandant of the Marine Corps, informed the Applicant that he was revoking his promotion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04133-01

    Original file (04133-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Copies of RFC documents appearing in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) are at Tab B. removal of the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 17 April 1996, a copy of which is at Tab C, as he says it resulted from the fitness report. He provides his rebuttal of 17 April 1996 to the page 11 entry, and he states that he does not know why it is not in his record. The Board for Correction of Naval Records disapprove request for removal of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03156-01

    Original file (03156-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You also made new requests to remove your relief for cause from recruiting duty, which was requested on 5 April 1999; your nonjudicial punishment of 29 March 1999; and your service record page 11 counseling entries dated 17 and 24 February 1999. We are asked to provide an advisory opinion on Petitioner's request for the removal from his Service Record Book (SRB) and his official military personnel file (OMPF) of all references to his nonjudicial punishment (NJP) of 29 March 1999 and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08387-01

    Original file (08387-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Petitioner denied that the applicant Petitioner was offered, and he accepted, NJP. Analysis a. Petitioner claims that his NJP was unjust because he believes the preliminary inquiry into his misconduct contained "inconsistencies" a statement Petitioner made at the NJP. The record of the NJP reveals that the NJP was just.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05696-01

    Original file (05696-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps dated 21 August 2001, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04998-00

    Original file (04998-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280RUSSELL ROA D QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 134-5 103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 161 0 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF STAFF USMC SERGEAN (a) (b) SSgt. VIRGINIA 22134-5103 NAVY IN REPLY REFER TO: 107 0 .MI MEMORANDUM FOR...