Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06004-05
Original file (06004-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                2 NAVY ANNEX
                          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

                                                    MEH
                                                     Docket No. 6004-05
                                                     18 October 2005


From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:   Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO


Ref:  (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

End:  (1)      DD Form 149 w/attachments
       (2) NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 4811/503 of 26 September 2005
       (3) Subject’s naval record

1.    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting,
in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish
entitlement to an increased amount of zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus
(SRB) for the SK rating.

2.    The Board, consisting of Messrs ~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the
Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3.    The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

     a.     Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within
the Department of the Navy.

     b.     In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.

CONCLUS ION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially
in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of
an injustice warranting the following corrective action.


















                                                 Docket No. 6004-05




RECOMMENDAT ION:

That Petitioners s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show
that:

     a.     The reenlistment executed on or about 29 June 2005 is for a term
of 6 years, vice 3 years.

     b.     This change will entitle petitioner to an increased amount of
zone “B” SRB with an award level of 1.0 for the SK rating.

     c.     A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4.    Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for
Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the
Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.


ROBERT D. ZSALMAN      WILLIAM J.HESS III
Recorder    Acting Recorder

5.    Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of
the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32
Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been
approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



      18 October 2005                         W. DEAN PFIEFFER
                                        Executive Director





























                                      2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09328-05

    Original file (09328-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100MEHDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Full Time Support (FTS) Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the SK rating.2. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegation of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04789-05

    Original file (04789-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the IT rating (NEC 2780).2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McBride, Pfeiffer, and Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 August 2005 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05640-05

    Original file (05640-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Dawson, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06071-05

    Original file (06071-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the GSM rating. The Board, consisting of ~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06763-05

    Original file (06763-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the AD rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01407-06

    Original file (01407-06.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “B’ Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ABE rating. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04355-05

    Original file (04355-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the DT rating (NEC 8708).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Ms. Countryman, and Ms. LeBlanc, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 August 2005 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00917-04

    Original file (00917-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the SK rating. Copy to: DFAS w/o enclosures CNP w/o enclosures In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in the naval record of the subject.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06061-05

    Original file (06061-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09906-08

    Original file (09906-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    9906-08 12 May 2009 From: .Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George,...