Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06067-05
Original file (06067-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved


                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                2 NAVY ANNEX
                          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

                                                         MEH
                                                          Docket No. 6067-05
                                                          18 October 2005


     From:  Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
     To:    Secretary of the Navy

     Subj:  REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO


     Ref:   (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

     End:   (1) DD Form 149 w/attacliments
            (2)  NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 4811/507 of 26 September 2005
            (3)  Subject’s naval record

     1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
     referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
     requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
     to cancel a reenlistment.

     2.     The Board, consisting of Messrs.~UMIUUIUIIIUIjIUIIPIIIJI~
     reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October
     2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
     action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
     record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
     enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
     policies.

     3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
     Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

         a.      Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
     administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
     within the Department of the Navy.

         b.      In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
     having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
     application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
     warrants favorable action.

     CONCLUS ION

     Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
     especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
     the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
     action.
















                                                 Docket No. 6067-05




RECOMIXIENDAT ION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show
that:

     a.     The reenlistment executed on or about 24 June 2005 is null and
void. This will reestablish petitioner’s previous EAOS of 11 March 2006.

     b.     A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4.    Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for
Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the
Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter.     /
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN      WILLIAM J HESS III
Recorder    Acting Recorder

5.    Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of
the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32
Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been
approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



     18 October 2005















                                      2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06004-05

    Original file (06004-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the SK rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs ~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02570-05

    Original file (02570-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07402-05

    Original file (07402-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06391-05

    Original file (06391-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel an extension agreement. The Board, consisting of Messrs, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06261-05

    Original file (06261-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06061-05

    Original file (06061-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03393-05

    Original file (03393-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject’s former spouse, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06071-05

    Original file (06071-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the GSM rating. The Board, consisting of ~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06763-05

    Original file (06763-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the AD rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06132-05

    Original file (06132-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. The Board, consisting of ~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records...