Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09649-04
Original file (09649-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
Dear 4umummmaum*mmmIuIP~
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
         2 NAVY ANNEX     SRB
          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100         Docket No. 9649—04
                  23 March 2005












 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 March 2005. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 SerN13OD1/05U0171 dated, 10 March 2005 a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

 Sincerely,
7



W.       DEAN PFEIFF
 Executive Dire o
 Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON


 ii
          WASHINGTON, D.C. 203~O-2OOO      IN REPLY REFER TO
 5420
          Ser N13OD1/05U0171
 10 Mar 05
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS

 Subj:    COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF

End:     (1) BCNR case file #09649-04 with CD service record
1.       N130 recommends disapproval of I~IUIIUU1MWUm~ petition to change her Enlistment Bonus (EB) to “the amount I signed for prior tobootcamp”.
2.       ~ request was reviewed and all information provided in the CNO Comment and Recommendation letter (N13001/04U0573 dated 12 Aug 04) was determined to be accurate and correct.
3.       ~IU~I~~UiP qualifies for an $8,000 EB. No further action is required.
4.       BCNR case file with CD service record is returned herewith as enclosure (1)



~n±isrea Bon~sJPrograms
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS


 Ii
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON,D.C. 203~O-200O
IN REPLY REFER TO:
5420
Ser N13OD1/04U0573
12 Aug 04
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS

 Subj:    COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF

Ref:     (a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.8F, section 3U
End:     (1) BCNR case file #05690-04 with CD service record
1.       The following provides comment and recommendation on petition.
2.       N130 recommends disapproval of ~ petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) in the amount of $12,000.
3.       NI~UflI~hi entered the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 15 January 2002, volunteered for the Nuclear Field Program Guarantee, College Assistance/Student Headstart (CASH) Program, and signed an EB contract in the amount of $12,000. She entered active duty via the CASH program 18 December 2002 and shipped to Recruit Training Center (RTC) 27 June 2003. In her petition
 ~        favorable action that would allow payment of an EB of $12,000.
4.       In accordance with reference (a) EB entitlement for members enrolled in the CASH program will be based on the date the member reports to RTC and the EB message in effect at the time of DEP enlistment. NAVADMIN 180/01 201100Z Jul 01 (message in effect at the time dJUUU~q~~qI~Iq5Ientered the DEP), a member entering the Nuclear Field program and shipping to RTC June through September, is eligible for an EB at the award level of $8,000. ~IUUUPIE~Uuiii~i qualifies for an EB of $8,000. Recommend BCNR update the members Annex “C” to her DD Form 4 to reflect an EB in the amount of $8,000. As of this date member can be paid 20% of her EB.
5.       BCNR case file with CD service record is returned herewith as enclosure (1)
 Subj:    COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER




Assistant, i~nlisted Bonus
Programs Branch

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 08523-04

    Original file (08523-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 March 2005. UUUUIUIhIh~ entered the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 08 August 2001, volunteered for the NUCLEAR FIELD PROGRAM guarantee and signed a contract for an $8,000 Enlistment Bonus (EB) and a $3,000 EBCC. Review of iIUIqMhin~flfhIII~I case file shows she did not complete her Nuclear Field training and is therefore not entitled to an EBCC.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04588-02

    Original file (04588-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ‘I JLP: ddj Docket No: 4588-02 8 October 2002 This is in reference provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. to.your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09988-06

    Original file (09988-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/07U0110 of 10 Apr 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04123-03

    Original file (04123-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 20350-200 Y IN REPLY REFER TO: 5420 N130D1/03U0651 10 Sep 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #0412,3-03 with microfiche service record ng provides comment and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05882-06

    Original file (05882-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/06U066l of 10 Nov 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04584-02

    Original file (04584-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In accordance with BUPERS message 231454AUG99, (message in effect at the time Petty Officer Siienaiaie.. entered the DEP), the NF Program Was eligible for an EB of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05688-03

    Original file (05688-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. 03UO658 5420 N130D1/ 10 Sep 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NAVAL RECORDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj : E OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05688-03 with microfiche service record provides comment and recommendation on petition. enters the DEP and the day the member ships to active duty, determines the amount of EB a member is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00899-05

    Original file (00899-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 March 2005. 4IUU~U~~I~entered the Navy through the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 12 January 2004 and volunteered for the Nuclear Field (NF) Open Program Guarantee with a $10,000 Enlistment Bonus (EB) . He was not guaranteed an EBCC.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00593-01

    Original file (00593-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N of which is attached. N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer 2. petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) . In his Id requests favorable action as disenrolled from he Electronics EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the Members who fail to complete basic including failure to graduate from and who do not continue in the skill for which The Navy offers an 4. discretion of recruiters and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05512-03

    Original file (05512-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material 'error or injustice. In accordance with BUPERS message 2011002 JUL 01 (message in effect at the time entering the Nuclear Field program and shipping to active duty between December 2001 and May...