Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05871-03
Original file (05871-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTIONOF NAVALRECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP: ecb
Docket No: 5871-03
28 October 2003

This is in reference to your
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 28 October 2003.
Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420  
of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

N130D/03U0733 dated 16 October 2003, a copy

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

Enclosure

DEPARTMENTOFTHENAV

Y
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000  NAVY PENTAGON

WASHINGT0N.D.C.  20350-200

0

IN  REPLY REFER TO:

5420
N130D/  031~0733
16 

Ott 2003

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

HE CASE OF

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#05871-03 with microfiche service record

following provides comment and recommendation on

petition.

N130 recommends disapproval of

2.
Enlistment Bonus (EB) for College Credit.

petition for an

entered the Navy through the Delayed Entry

18 April 2001,

volunteered for the Cryptologic

Technician Interpretive (SG-CTI) School Guarantee Program, and
signed an EB Contract for $6,000 along with an EB College Kicker
of $6,000.
Command (RTC).
action that would allow payment of the EB College Kicker.

ed to Recruit Training
requests favorable

On 19 July 2001, she shi

In her petition,

EB eligible ratings and award levels are announced via OPNAV
The message in effect the day a member enters the DEP

4.
messages.
determines the amount of EB a member is eligible to receive. In
accordance BUPERS message 1421232 NOV 00 (message in effect at the
time
eligible program and with an EB contract are eligible for an EB
Kicker.

a member enlisting in an EB

entered DEP),

failed to complete  
which was not EB eligible.

CT1 school and entered a

Therefore,

entitled to an EB College Kicker.

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned

5.
herewith as enclosure (1).

.-,

,_.“_

_“.
- 
Enlisted Bonus

Head,
Programs Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00549-02

    Original file (00549-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the material considered by the Board consisted of your in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory N13D1/02U0377 29 July 2002, a copy of which emorandum 5420 However, the Chief of Naval Operations has College Kicker in your pay account. MEMORANDUM FOR T E EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj ASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07383-02

    Original file (07383-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 20350-2000 54rQl@PLV REFER TO N130D1/02U0589 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NAVAL RECORDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj : HE CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07383-02 with microfiche service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07068-01

    Original file (07068-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 N130Dl/ 7 May 2002 02UO198 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07068-01 with microfiche service record 1. entered the Delayed Entry Program , volunteered for the Advanced Command (RTC) on 22 September 2000. requests favorable action that'would allow payment of an Petty Officer EB College Kicker in addition to the EB that is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08167-01

    Original file (08167-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. '/Q2W%WTo MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: record ( 1 ) BCNR case file #08167-01 with microfiche service ing provides comment and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01458-03

    Original file (01458-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 03210239 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07000-02

    Original file (07000-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 2002. that would allow payment of an $8,000 He shipped to Recruit T In his petition, Seaman 2001, and signed contract for a volunteered for the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00249-02

    Original file (00249-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05739-02

    Original file (05739-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/ 29 Ott 2002 02UO582 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF, I T Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05739-02 with microfiche service record 1. Every recruit is not offered nor The EB program is budgeted based Navy Recruiting Command and Seaman,mhas a valid EB Contract...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06671-02

    Original file (06671-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION CASE OF SEAMAN

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04268-02

    Original file (04268-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Seaman 2001. and signed an EB contract in the to Recruit Training Command (RTC) requests.favorable action that Kicker in addition to the EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the 4. discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to enlist in critical skills. Correction of Naval Records, Docket No.