Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04638-03
Original file (04638-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 4638-03
19 August 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions 

qf title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 19 August 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

11A 

l/371 of 24 July 2003, a copy of which

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

IAW  l  ERSOWNLL 
INTLIRITY  

57tO  
MlLLlWDTOl

TN 

COMMAND
DRIVE

 

a805  5-0000

1430
Ser 
24  Jul  03

811A1/311

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

RECORDS (BCNR)

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOXCB)

Subj:

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

IN THE

CASE OF

Ref:

Encl:

(a) BUPERSINST 1430.163

(1) BCNR file 

#04638-03

Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a),

1.
enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.

ates his DD214 reflects advancement to AD2.

DD214 it was noted that he completed the
Petty Officer Second Class and AD2, however

there is no record of him being advanced or a pending advancement
to AD2.

No relief can be

recomme

Upon



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04365-03

    Original file (04365-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02103-03

    Original file (02103-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430, Ser 8 11 A is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05720-03

    Original file (05720-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01823-03

    Original file (01823-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03177-06

    Original file (03177-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandums 1430 Ser 48llE9/375, 13 June 2006 and 11 December 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), enclosure (1) is returned with the following...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02828-03

    Original file (02828-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:lc Docket No: 2828-03 24 June 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10814-02

    Original file (10814-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 11 A attached. S requesting that if he is selected for advancement from the March 2003 exam that his advancement be backdated to September 2002 exam.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09292-06

    Original file (09292-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 48l1E9/746, 26 December 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02746-03

    Original file (02746-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum, 1430 Ser 811 is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05219-03

    Original file (05219-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.