Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05219-03
Original file (05219-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

 

20370-5100

LCC:ddi
Docket 
26 August 2003

ho: 5219-03

NAVY 
WASHINGTON DC

2 

ANNEX

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 26 August 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by 
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

l/388 of 3 1 July 2003, a copy of which

NRC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 

11A 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

E0811 A1, 

31 Jul 03

3238

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL
RECORDS (BCNR)

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOXCB)

Subj:

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE

OF

Ref:

(a) BUPERSINST 1430.163
(b) OPNAVINST  

6110.1G

Encl:

(1) BCNR file  

#05219-03

1.
and 

Based on policy and guidelines established in references (a)
(b), enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.

As outline in reference  

(b) Commanding Officers have the
2.
discretion to frock/advance enlisted personnel in a selectee
status under their command.
IT2 was properly withheld at the
officer for failure to meet PFA standards in accordance with

discretion of her commanding

Petty Officer

advancement to

.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04859-03

    Original file (04859-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000IN REPLY REFER TO: 5420 N13OD1/...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02612-03

    Original file (02612-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO: 5420N13 OD1 /03U0557 6 Aug 2003MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00320-03

    Original file (00320-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 0 3 ~ 0 2 4 5 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN APPRENTICE . In his petition, Seaman Apprentice a requests favorable action that would allow payment of a $2,000 EB College Kicker.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04554-03

    Original file (04554-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. 8 Aug 2'003 03UO563 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: OMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER 4 -: Encl: (1) BCNR case file #04554-03 with microfiche service record The 1. April 2001. favorable action that would allow payment of a $9,000 In her petition, Petty Officer -request She shipped to Recruit Training Command the Navy through the Delayed s EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01458-03

    Original file (01458-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 03210239 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00762-03

    Original file (00762-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. N130 recommends disapproval of for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) Colleg 3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00761-03

    Original file (00761-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In his petition, action that would allow paym CF Program quests favorable EB College Kicker.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00036-03

    Original file (00036-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer College Kicker EB contract in his service record and therefore is not entitled to a College Kicker EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05140-06

    Original file (05140-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 9 September and 6 October 2006, copies of which are attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Official record reviews indicated that member was approved for conversion from the NM rating to GSM rating under the Selective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04272-06

    Original file (04272-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chief Petty Officer XXXX was selected to Senior Chief Petty Officer with an effective date of 16 December 1998.b. BCNR ltr LCC:ddj Docket No: 9653-02 of 1 April 2003, directed Chief retroactive advancement to Senior Chief Petty Officer be effective since there was no advisory indicating he was not in an eligible status to be advanced on that date. RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF HMCM Per reference (c), Chief XXXX new Time in Rate established his first eligibility for consideration to...