Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04316-03
Original file (04316-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No: 4316-03
25 June 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 25 June 2003.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 25 June
2003, a copy of which is attached,
opinion.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

In this connection, the Board substantially

and your rebuttal to the

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

!

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

3280 RUSSELL

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA

  ROA D
  22 

134-S 103

;

i’b%B”  REFER   TO :
MMER/RE

HAY 0 2

 

2003

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF FORMER LANCE CORPORAL

SUBJ: RECODE

1.
det
assigned.
The reenlistment code was assigned based on his
overall record and means that he did not meet the physical/
medical standards for reenlistment at the time of separation.

ervice  record has been reviewed and it has been
s reenlistment code of RE-3P was correctly

Physical Disability.

as honorably discharged on December 15, 1995 by
It was determined by a medical

2.
reason of
board that he suffered from PES Cavus and that the condition
existed prior to his entry into the Marine Corps.
his service record indicates that he was counseled concerning
losing his identification card.
November 20,
entry acknowledging assignment of the RE-3P reenlistment code.

It is also noted that on
1995, he signed an official service record book

A review of

After a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters

3.
concurs in the professional evaluation of
cations for reenlistment at the time of separation.
is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or upgraded as
a result of events that occur after separation or based merely on
the passage of time.

qualifi-
Once a code

The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an

4 .
administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability
for reenlistment at the time of separation from the Marine Corps.
The code may, however,
be waived at the discretion of the
acquiring branch of service per their own policies and
regulations.

5.

The enclosure is returned for final action.

Performance Evaluation

He-ad,
Review Branch
Personnel Management Division
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02955-03

    Original file (02955-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In addition, the Board noted that your DD Form 214 erroneously indicates that you were discharged...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05850-03

    Original file (05850-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The reenlistment code was assigned based on his overall record and means that he did not meet the physical/ medical standards for reenlistment at the time of separation. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03211-03

    Original file (03211-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code was assigned based on her overall record and means that she did not meet the physical/ medical standards for reenlistment at the time of separation. Once a code The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an 4 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02963-03

    Original file (02963-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02392-03

    Original file (02392-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06336-03

    Original file (06336-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 10 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 18 July 2003, a copy of which...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02041-03

    Original file (02041-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability for reenlistment at the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00697-03

    Original file (00697-03.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Mr. service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE—3P was correctly assigned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06851-06

    Original file (06851-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 27 July 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02416-03

    Original file (02416-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine C*orps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability for reenlistment at the time...