Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03163-09
Original file (03163-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5109 TRG

Docket No: 3163-09
25 June 2009

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To; Secretary of the Navy

 

 

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF

 

me

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: {1} Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with
this Board requesting that his records be corrected to show that
he had participation in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) so

that he will be eligible for remedial consideration for promotion
to gunnery sergeant.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. ue. Ms . aiiiiileiamialis 20. MS .

“reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 23 June 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3, The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner's application was filed ina timely manner.

ec. Petitioner, a Marine Corp Reservist, was severely
injured during operations in Iraq and has been awarded the Purple
Heart. He was released from active duty on 27 February 2004,
apparently without proper evaluation of his injuries.
Subsequently, he was discharged from the Marine Corps Reserv
when he was denied reenlistment. It appears that this occurred
because he was considered not physically qualified. On 21 June
2007, based on 4 favorable recommendation from Headquarters
Marine Corps, this Board directed that he be reinstated in the
TRR and that a iine of duty determination for his injuries be
made. When this action was accomplished, Petitioner was ordered

to adtive duty pending evaluation of his condition.
d. Petitioner's Career Retirement Credit Report (CRCR) now
shows that he was released from active duty in 2004 and that he
was only credited with 15 membership points in the four
anniversary years beginning on 22 July 2004 and ending on 21 July
2008. Petitioner is being denied consideration for remedial
promotion to gunnery sergeant because he has no participation
while in the IRR. He could not participate during the time that
he was discharged from the IRR. Petitioner has informed the

retirement.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. Since Headquarters Marine Corps and the Board agree that
he should not have been discharged and the record has been
corrected to show continuous service, the Board believes that the
record should now be further corrected to show that he was
credited with 35 nonpay retirement points in each of the four
anniversary years beginning on 22 July 2004 and ending on 21 July
2008. When his correction is made, it appears that he will be
eligible for remedial consideration for promotion.

The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings
should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future
reviewers will understand the reasons for the correction to this
record.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by crediting him
with 35 nonpay retirement points in the four anniversary years
beginning on 22 July 2004 and ending on 21 July 2008.

b. That Petitioner be considered for remedial consideration for
promotion to gunnery sergeant if otherwise eligible.

c. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's
naval record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter. —
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN : BRIAN \ GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5, Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Lee )
W. DEAN
Executive Di

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06620-01

    Original file (06620-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the next three anniversary years he has been credited with 15 points from annual training and 15 membership points for a total of 30 points in each year. These diary entries do not show that he attended drills, but do show that he was retained in the unit, performed annual training, (E- 4) points because there is no documentation, but has advised him to petition this Board. Accordingly, Petitioner's record should be nonpay retirement In addition, he should be credited with 35 Nonpay...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08512-01

    Original file (08512-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record < enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed an Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that three anniversary years are qualifying for reserve retirement. proficiency marks, and was awarded the Organized Reserve Medal, it appears that Petitioner probably attended drills during the period at issue. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05230-01

    Original file (05230-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner,' a 1. former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show four additional qualifying years for reserve retirement. Petitioner was honorably discharged on 12 May 1983. e. Attached to enclosure (1) is an advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) which recommends that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06492-02

    Original file (06492-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 N A V Y A N N E X WASHINGTON D C 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 6492-02 15 April 2003 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF - (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Marine Corps Reserve , filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show additional retirement...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05904-02

    Original file (05904-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. commissioned officer in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected by crediting him with five retirement points in the anniversary year ending 20 December 1998. Petitioner's record should be corrected by crediting him with nonpay drills in the anniversary year ending 20...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03808-02

    Original file (03808-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, he is not eligible for reserve retirement A review of e. Petitioner states in his application that he was Accordingly, he failed to earn a qualifying years in initially unaware of the requirement to qualify for reserve retirement. majority notes that Petitioner will have 20 qualifying years and would be eligible for retirement except for the requirement that the last eight years of qualifying service be in the reserve component. With this correction Petitioner Therefore, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07251-01

    Original file (07251-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve'on 2 December 1977 for three years and subsequently earned two qualifying years for reserve retirement. e. Petitioner contends in her application that she actually performed additional drills in the anniversary year ending 1 December 1980. training, was promoted to CPL and was assigned 4.9 marks in conduct and proficiency, occurred if she was not attending drills. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10069-08

    Original file (10069-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX TRG WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 10069-08 19 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF «gigi Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. At the end of his anniversary year on 18 April 2001 he was only credited with 42 of the 50 retirement points necessary for another qualifying year. Although Petitioner requested that the transfer to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07294-00

    Original file (07294-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show qualifying years for reserve retirement during the period 4 August 1967 through 3 August 1971. Since the number of drills he attended cannot be verified, the Board concludes that he should be credited with the minimum number of nonpay drills to make each of the anniversary years, from 9...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08589-01

    Original file (08589-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the Board believes that HQMC's suggestion Therefore, the Board concludes that Petitioner's record should be corrected by transferring sufficient retirement points from the excess over 50 in qualifying years into the three anniversary years ending on 14 July 1983, 14 July 1984 and 11 May 1992, to With this make those years qualifying for reserve retirement. correction, Petitioner will have 20 qualifying years and will be Since Petitioner is already eligible for retired pay at age...