Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03480-03
Original file (03480-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC: lc
Docket No: 3480-03
24 June 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section

1552.

 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum, 5420 PERS-812, 5 June 2003, a copy of which is
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENI- OF THE NAV Y

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380550000

5420
PERS-812
,k.JlJ~ 

2003

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Via :

Assistant  for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Subj:*

.

Ref:

(a) 

;;si;y;;  for BCNR Matters 5420 PERS-OOZCB Memo of

(b) BUPERSINST 1401.2

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

The fol

1.
concerning

endations are submitted
case.

2.
Recommend disapproval fo
The only avenue for this typ
Enlisted Selection Board.
be requested within nine months of the original board. This
particular board adjourned on   21 July 1999.

request.
Special
(b) Special Boards must

Per reference  



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06557-02

    Original file (06557-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The FMS required for advancement to MS2 for that cycle was 181.58. in the March 1994 (Cycle 143) Navywide 3.-was credited with 4 award points for Cycle 143.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01576-02

    Original file (01576-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00959-02

    Original file (00959-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the member should provide...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00080-03

    Original file (00080-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 80-03 10 June 2003 ” This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06339-02

    Original file (06339-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Pers 812 of 10 September 2002, a copy of which is attached. further action required.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05917-01

    Original file (05917-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or iIi+justice. NRMSM for 1997 = 2 points; BS - Points are awarded based how well the member - There is no evidence that the Total...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03865-03

    Original file (03865-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7220 PERS-823 of 2 July 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05949-00

    Original file (05949-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The petitioner has requested BCNR action based on the 2. following injustices: a . retire in paygrade, BUPERS (PERS-834) concurred that he had completed all actions required by said agreement. paygrade in lieu of mandatory He was convicted at The petitioner maintains that the government violated the 4. terms of his pre-trial agreement and forced an action more severe than he intended when he two completely separate issues agreement were fulfilled when his original request was denied The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01161-03

    Original file (01161-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosure (1) is returned with the following comments and request for an receive a Reserve a former Naval Officer, is requesting an 2. appointment in the Naval Reserve.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08817-02

    Original file (08817-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an official...