DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Y
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 59 17-01
30 October 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the
Ifnited States Code, section
1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 October 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC 5420 Pers 8
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
12 of 27 September 200
1, a copy of which is attached.
Your allegations of error and injustice
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
iIi+justice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
COMMAND
PERSONNEL
N AVY
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
5420
PERS-812
SEP
2 7
2001
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)
Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)
Via:
Subj:
Ref:
(a) Assistant for BCNR Matters 5420 Pers-OOZCB Memo of
21 Aug 01
(b) BUPERSINST 1430.163
(3) LOS
- Member is receiving 30.25
(1) PMA
(4) AWARDS
- Member is receiving 34 points, that is the maximum
that is the maximum points an individual with his LOS and
- Member signed his evaluation indicating no
The member should have requested the eval be
1. The following issues are addressed in order as listed on the
attachment:
statement desired.
changed at the time or indicated a desire to submit a statement.
(2) SIPG
points awarded for this area.
points,
SIPG can receive.
member is eligible for a Good Conduct Award.
.The information
provided showed 3 years 7 months and 8 days of active service, shy
of the minimum requirement of 3 years 9 months for eligibility.
There is also insufficient evidence to support Naval Reserve
Meritorious Service Medal eligibility.
number of drills credited we can not determine members conduct
warranted eligibility.
However, with crediting all eligible
NRMSM's members Award points
1 point; NRMSM for 1993 = 1 point;
Degree = 2 points.
(5) PNA POINTS
Although scoring well on the exam does award PNA points, it does
not guarantee them.
did compared to how others scored.
NRMSM for 1997 = 2 points; BS
-
Points are awarded based how well the member
- There is no evidence that the
Total Award points = 6.
would.be as follows: NRMSM for 1989 =
Although we can determine
In view of the above,
the members test scores are average. He
Although I certainly understand his frustration, he
2.
was 4 points above average on cycle 066 and 2 points below average
on cycle 065.
did leave 18 points on the table for cycle 066 needing 8.1 more to
be advanced and left 23 points on the table for cycle 065 needing
6.50 more to be advanced.
Both of these cycles were within his
reach if he perhaps would have studied harder.
feel that this member did not exhaust all of his administrative
resources prior to submitting his request to the BCNR.
In addition, we
All of the information we have provided could
3.
provided by his local Education Services Officer.
we can determine is on Cycle 066 the member was credited for 2
more award points that he actually earned.
No action required.
have bee
n
The only error
direction
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05495-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03362-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 16 August 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04472-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 481lE9/525, 17 August 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06557-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The FMS required for advancement to MS2 for that cycle was 181.58. in the March 1994 (Cycle 143) Navywide 3.-was credited with 4 award points for Cycle 143.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06339-02
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Pers 812 of 10 September 2002, a copy of which is attached. further action required.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09732-05
9732-05 8 Mar 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03834-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10587-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/057 of 16 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02628-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum tc reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05921-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 4811E9/064, 7 February 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...