DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 71-01
27 March 2001
Dear PETTY 0
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER
which is attached.
85/218 of 14 March 2001, a copy of
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Additionally, Passed Not Advanced (PNA) points can only used for five
of the last six exams. Any PNA points that would have been awarded from the September 1997
exam could not have been used since you would then be using PNA points for a total of six
exams. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of
the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Enclosure
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
COMMAND
PERSONNEL
NAVY
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
1430
Ser
14 Mar 01
85/218
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL
RECORDS (BCNR)
Via:
Assistant for BCNR Matters
(PERS-OOXCB)
Subj:
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF
Ref:
(a) BUPERSINST
1430.16D
Encl:
(1) BCNR file
#00071-00
Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a),
1.
enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.
Petty Officer
2.
examination cycle he did not participate in.
provisions within reference (a) to award
situation.
has requested
No relief can be recommended in this case.
PN"A" points for an
There are no
PN"A" points in this
By direction
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09732-05
9732-05 8 Mar 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05855-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04472-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 481lE9/525, 17 August 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808627
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1430 Ser 852/210 of 10 June 1999, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04568-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, hv Executive Director Enclosure DIPARIMBWT OF TI41 NAVY 1430 Ser 8llAl/ 351 17 Jul 03 MEMORANDUM FOR...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02107-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 7 July 2001. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer was denied the opportunity to compete 3 for advancement in examination cycle 168, September 2000.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02021-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05921-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 4811E9/064, 7 February 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08627-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ;ill material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. If a member is denied an opportunity to participate in a Navywide examination and if selected for advancement through participation in a subsequent examination, a member may request a backdated advancement. Therefore, no relief is recommended in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03834-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...