Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07290-07
Original file (07290-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5 100


 LCC
 Docket No. 7290-07
11 Dec 07


Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552,
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8llE9/535, of 16 November 2007, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.


Sincerely,

                                                      W. DEAN PFEIFFER
                                                      Executive Director
Enclosure


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

                                    1430
                                                                                                    Ser 811E9/53 5
                                                                                                   16 Nov 07
MEMORANDUM FOR CONGRESSIONAL MATTERS (PERS-31C)
Subj:    COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF

         Ref:     (a)      BUPERSINST l430.16F
                  (b)      Chief Petty Officer In Charge, CSD Tampa, FL ltr 1000
                           Ser 00/15 of 23 Apr 07
En cl :    (1) BCNR file # 07290—07
1. Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), and enclosure (1) is returned with the following comments.
2. is requesting to have her Final Multiple Score (FMS) for the March 2007 (Cycle 195)
examination be compared to the September 2006 (Cycle 192) advancement examination
for HM1/E6.

3. Upon further review is a Full Time Support(FTS) Sailor. But due to an administrative oversight she was given a SELRES examination for HM1/E6 for the August 2006 (Cycle 079) for HM1/E6. Per reference (a), the member should have taken the September 2006 (Cycle 192) active component examination. Per reference (b) , the command did not order a late examination for the member. PERS-811 coordinated with NETPDTC to have the member March 2007 active advancement examination be compared to the September 2006 (Cycle 192 final multiple for the March 2007 (Cycle 195) was 207.51 and the final multiple required for the September
2006 (Cycle 192) advancement to HM1 was 214.63 would not have advanced to HM1 from the September 2006 (Cycle l92)exam. Therefore, the member is not recommended for backdated advancement to HM1.
4. This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Point of contact is PSCS(SW/AW) Milton Lewis, DSN 882-3238       or E-mail milton.lewis@navy.mil.




By direction

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07391-07

    Original file (07391-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811E9/536 of 16 November 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10587-07

    Original file (10587-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/057 of 16 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00077-08

    Original file (00077-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material -submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/198 of 27 Feb 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04472-05

    Original file (04472-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 481lE9/525, 17 August 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04708-07

    Original file (04708-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 PERS812 of 27 July 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01413-08

    Original file (01413-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09292-06

    Original file (09292-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 48l1E9/746, 26 December 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02628-09

    Original file (02628-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum tc reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09999-07

    Original file (09999-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/034 of 11 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10315-06

    Original file (10315-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10315-06 7 Feb 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...