r
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
S
CRS
Docket No: 4734-01
8 August 2001
Your allegations of error and
The
21
une and 19 September 2000.
The offenses
of the Board for Correction of Naval
naval,record and applicable statutes, regulations
.of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
t
gether with all material submitted in support
/
Dear'
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member pane
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 1 Au ust 2001.
revi wed in accordance with administrative
injustice were
regulations and pro edures applicable to the proceedings
Board.
your application,
thereof, your
and policies.
After careful and c nscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board
und that the evidence submitted was
blish the existence of probable material
insufficient to
error or injustice.
The Board found tha you enlisted in the Navy on 23 March 2000 at
age 17.
punishments, on
included unauthoriz d absences totalling 103 days and disrespect.
On 4 October 2000 t e commanding officer recommended that you be
separated with an o her than honorable discharge by reason of
When informed
misconduct due to c mmission of a serious offense.
you elected to waive the right to present
of the recommedatio
After review by
your case to an
the discharge autho ity, the recommendation for separation was
ctober 2000 you were discharged with an other
approved and on 18
than honorable disc arge.
reenlistment code o
RE-4.
Applicable regulati
ns require the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code w en an individual is discharged by reason of
ou have been treated no differently than
Since
misconduct.
the Board could not find an error or
others in your situ tion,
that you received two nonjudicial
At that time you were assigned a
adm';istrative discharge board.
!
I
I
The names and
alpplication has been denied.
injustice in the assignment of your reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service should be changed, since you did not ask for such
consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative
remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached DD Form 293.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01227-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02065-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00183-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2003. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02833-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09559-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 25 October 2001. After review by the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04234-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2002. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03999-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with 1 material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injusticeThe Board found that you entitledSeptember 1998. The record ref lets that o 14 April 2000 you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02926-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02161-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03072-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy...