Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09068-02
Original file (09068-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                             2 NAVY ANNEX
 WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
                                                                                          JLP:ddj
                                                                                          Docket No: 9068-02
                                                                                          19 March 2003




This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N13OD1/03U0165 of 6 March 2003, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,



W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON D.C. 20350-2000

 IN REPLY REFER TO
 5420 N13OD1/
6 Mar 2003

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:    COMM4ENT AND RECONMENDATION IN THE CASE OF
End:     (1) BCNR case file #09068-02
1.                The following provides comment and recommendation on

 2.       N130 recommends disapproval of petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB).

3.       entered the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 23 July 2001 and volunteered for the Advanced Electronics Computer Field Program Guarantee. He requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB College Kicker.
4.       EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to enlist in critical skills. The EB program is budgeted based on quotas provided by the Commander, Navy Recruiting Command and the Enlisted Community Managers, not by the number of “A” School accession seats. An EB College Kicker is an EB and is governed under the preceding rules. Every recruit is not offered nor receives an EB or an EB College Kicker. does not have an EB College Kicker contract in his service record and therefore is not entitled to an EB College Kicker. No further action is necessary.
5.       BCNR case file is returned herewith as enclosure (1)



 Enlisted Bonus
Programs Branch

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08636-02

    Original file (08636-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYOFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000IN REPLY REFER TO 5420N13OD1 6 Mar 2003...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07564-02

    Original file (07564-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. He requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB College Kicker.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10457-02

    Original file (10457-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYCHIEF OF NAVAL PERSONNEL WASHINGTON, D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N13OD1/ 03U0112 3...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04859-03

    Original file (04859-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000IN REPLY REFER TO: 5420 N13OD1/...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00165-03

    Original file (00165-03.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 08523-04

    Original file (08523-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 March 2005. UUUUIUIhIh~ entered the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 08 August 2001, volunteered for the NUCLEAR FIELD PROGRAM guarantee and signed a contract for an $8,000 Enlistment Bonus (EB) and a $3,000 EBCC. Review of iIUIqMhin~flfhIII~I case file shows she did not complete her Nuclear Field training and is therefore not entitled to an EBCC.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10564-02

    Original file (10564-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Recorda, sitting in executive session, considered your application on May 6, 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman petition.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01458-03

    Original file (01458-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 03210239 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00762-03

    Original file (00762-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. N130 recommends disapproval of for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) Colleg 3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00761-03

    Original file (00761-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In his petition, action that would allow paym CF Program quests favorable EB College Kicker.