Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08282-02
Original file (08282-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

Docket No: 8282-02
22 January 2003

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Subj: F O

REVIEW

NAVAL 

RECORD

Ref: (a)

10 

U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1)

DD Form 149

(2) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to
show that he was assigned a reenlistment code other than the RE-4 code he received on 24
May 

2001.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Frankfurt and Pfeiffer, reviewed 
allegations of error and injustice on 9 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

PetiQoner’s

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

c. Petitioner served on active duty in the Navy from 26 March to 24 May 2001, when
he was discharged by reason of his failure to meet procurement medical standards because of
kyphosis. He was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. He maintains that he is fit for
service, and does not suffer from kyphosis.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that
Petitioner does suffer from kyphosis, and that his discharge was proper; however, it does not
believe he should bear the stigma associated with a reenlistment code of RE-4. Accordingly,
the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a

reenlistment code of RE-3E on 24 May 2001.

b.. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner ’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the

Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

_

 

_

ROBERT D.
Recorder

ZSALMAN

5. Pursuant
to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of
the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board
on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11884 14

    Original file (NR11884 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and particularly in light of the Army orthopedic surgeon’s diagnosis, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting a change of Petitioner's reentry code. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 8 January 2014, he was issued an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 now of record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07119-02

    Original file (07119-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JRE Docket No: 25 September 7119-02 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: Encl: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02745-02

    Original file (02745-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment code more favorable than the code of RE-4 he was assigned on 21 February 2001. . 3 The Board, consisting of Ms. Davies and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Schultz, reviewed bktitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09763-02

    Original file (09763-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment code’ other than the RE-4 code he received on 17 July 2001. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Frankfurt and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00292-01

    Original file (00292-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board questing, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment (RF) code of RE-1, vice the code of RE-4 he received on 19 July 2000 2. He was discharged on 19 July 2000, for failing to meet medical/physical procurement standards because of a hearing loss. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06784-02

    Original file (06784-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she received a reenlistment code of RE-i, vice the RE-4 code she actually received on 13 September 2000. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that she was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-3, vice the code of RE-4 she actually received. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00365-03

    Original file (00365-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was was assigned a more favorable reenlistment code than the code of RE-4 he received on 13 September 2002. c. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08684-01

    Original file (08684-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    NAVY WASHINGTON DC 2 ANNEX DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 8684-01 8 February 2002 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nofziger and Messrs. Chapman and Kim, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02983-01

    Original file (02983-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was assigned a reenlistment code which will permit her to reenlist without having to obtain a waiver of disqualifying discharge. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Morgan and Shy, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 August 2001 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06802-02

    Original file (06802-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 6802-02 23 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. g. An RE-3H reenlistment code may be assigned...