Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02983-01
Original file (02983-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

JRE
Docket No: 2983-01
14 August 2001

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

-- 

,

(4
(1)
(2)
(3)

10 U.S.C. 1552

DD Form 149
Capt K.C. 
Subject’s naval record

O’Neil ltr 2983-01, 3 Aug 01

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to
show that she was assigned a reenlistment code which will permit her to reenlist without
having to obtain a waiver of disqualifying discharge.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Morgan and Shy, reviewed Petitioner’s
allegations of error and injustice on 9 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

C.

In correspondence attached as enclosure 

(2), the Specialty Leader for Pulmonary

Medicine advised the Board, in effect, that the record does not conclusively establish whether
or not Petitioner has asthma.
support the diagnosis of asthma, and there is another explanation for the abnormal test results
she had while in the Navy. He recommended that her request be granted.

In his opinion, the available information does not adequately

CONCLUSION:

The Board notes that Petitioner bears the burden of proving that she did not suffer from
asthma during her enlistment, and that her reenlistment code is therefore erroneous. It
concludes that the available evidence concerning the nature of the respiratory condition which
resulted in her discharge is equivocal; however, in view of the contents of enclosure 
Board concludes that it would be in the interest of justice to resolve doubt in Petitioner
favor. Accordingly, it finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.

(2), the

’s

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected to show that, as an exception to policy,
she was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-1 when discharged from the Navy on 14 March
2ooo.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
of the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07730-01

    Original file (07730-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was assigned a reenlistment code more favorable than the code of RE-4 she was assigned on 30 July 1998. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hogue, Kastner and allegations of error and injustice on 1 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01101-03

    Original file (01101-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    S Docket No: 1101-03 4 September 2003 DEPARTMENT Oi THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVALRECORD ANNEX NAVY 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : FORME REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ’ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was received a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05026-01

    Original file (05026-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 5026-01 18 December 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone DC rating...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08325-01

    Original file (08325-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a more favorable reenlistment code than the RE-4 code he received on 20 April 2001. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner and Rothlein and Ms. Schnittman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00513-01

    Original file (00513-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the corrected to establish entitlement to a zone DT rating (NEC 8708). Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9807325

    Original file (NC9807325.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 7325-98 16 July 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF 4% Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her reenlistment code be changed. Based on the doctors...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 09_16_49 CDT 2000

    c. age 20. doctor notes that “this condition was not correctable to meet Navy standards” and recommended administrative separation. Therefore, the Board concludes that the RE-4 Additionally, there is no However, the Board This code will alert recruiters that 2 The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future reviewers will be aware of the diagnosis of asthma and understand the reason for the change in the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05384-01

    Original file (05384-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Form 149 w/attachments memorandm 7220 Pers 822 of 28 August 2001 (1) DD NPC (2) (3) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner signed her on the date she graduated from medical school. The Board, consisting of Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03400-01

    Original file (03400-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JRE Docket No: 3400-01 14 August 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: (of the Navy Secretary Subj: FORME REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that her name was not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07541-01

    Original file (07541-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner received an additional extension to ship household goods (HHGs) at government expense incident to her transfer to the Fleet Reserve. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 December 2001...