Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02745-02
Original file (02745-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JRE
Docket No: 2745-02
25 September 2002

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Subj 

:

FORMER
REVIEW

Ref: (a)

10 

U.S.C. 1552

E:ncl :

(1)
(2)

DD Form 149
Subject’s naval record

1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to
show that he was assigned a reenlistment code more favorable than the code of RE-4 he was
assigned on 21 February 2001.

.

3

The Board, consisting of Ms. Davies and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Schultz, reviewed

bktitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 September 2002 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, 

nava1 records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice finds as follows:

’s allegations

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

C.

Petitioner served on active duty in the Navy from 11 January to 21 February 2001,

when he was discharged by reason of his failure to meet procurement medical/physical
standards, and assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
length discrepancy which caused pain. He contends that he was injured in the service, but
has recovered, and that he is fit for service.

He suffered from a disqualifying leg

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that as the
available records do not indicate that Petitioner ’s enlistment was procured through fraud by
his concealing a disqualifying condition, and as he committed no acts of misconduct during
his enlistment, it is unjust for him to bear the stigma associated with an RE-4 reenlistment
code. Accordingly, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a

reenlistment code of RE-3E on 21 February 2001, vice the RE-4 code he actually received on
that date.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

5.
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of
the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board
on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07119-02

    Original file (07119-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JRE Docket No: 25 September 7119-02 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: Encl: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06737-01

    Original file (06737-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, show that he was assigned a reenlistment code more favorable than the RE-4 code he received on 15 March 2001. in effect, that his naval record be corrected to b. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Harrison, Shy and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner 3 allegations of error and injustice on 25 April 2002 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08395-01

    Original file (08395-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WAsHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 6 February 2002 8395-01 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy FORME REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. committed any acts of misconduct during his enlistment, or performed his duties in an unsatisfactory manner, it would be in the interest of justice to assign him a reenlistment code RE-3E, which would permit him to apply for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00292-01

    Original file (00292-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board questing, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment (RF) code of RE-1, vice the code of RE-4 he received on 19 July 2000 2. He was discharged on 19 July 2000, for failing to meet medical/physical procurement standards because of a hearing loss. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08325-01

    Original file (08325-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a more favorable reenlistment code than the RE-4 code he received on 20 April 2001. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner and Rothlein and Ms. Schnittman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02456-01

    Original file (02456-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected to show that on 8 December 2000, was discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment, and assigned a reenlistment code of 3P in lieu of the code of RE-4 actually assigned on ,that date. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07015-01

    Original file (07015-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    states that because he is free of diplopia, Petitioner should be The doctor considered cured. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reason for the change in the reenlistment code. Therefore, the Board concludes that the Given the This code will alert RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that a. on 8 October 1999 he was assigned an RE-3E...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08684-01

    Original file (08684-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    NAVY WASHINGTON DC 2 ANNEX DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 8684-01 8 February 2002 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nofziger and Messrs. Chapman and Kim, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01088-01

    Original file (01088-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment (RE) code more favorable than the RE-4 he received on 25 March 1999. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected to show that on 25 March 1999, he was dischaarged by-reason of erroneous enlistment, and assigned a reenlistment code of RE-3P in lieu of the code of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03912-01

    Original file (03912-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY \ S JRE Docket No: 39 12-01 6 February 2002 BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : Ref: Encl: FORME REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nofziger and Messrs. Chapman and Kim, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...