Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08031-01
Original file (08031-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV

Y

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH: mh
Docket No: 803 l-01
16 July 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse
pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

’s naval record

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
ou 16 July 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
session, considered your application  
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse
and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1760 MMSR-6J of 2 April 2002, a copy of which is
attached.

’s naval record
In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE

3280  RUSSELL ROA

D

QUANTICO,  

VlRGlNlA  22  

134-S  

Y
  CORP S

103

IN  REPLY REFER TO.
176 0
MMSR-6J
2 Apr 02

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

Ref:

(a) MMER Route Sheet of  

19Mar02, Docket No. 8031-01

eference requests an advisory opinion on
petition to correct her husband's record
retired Marine, enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan

(SBP) with spouse coverage when he died on 12 September 1994.

ervice record shows that he served in the
eptember 1956 through 22 December 1964 when
He was not re-

he was discharged as a sergeant, pay grade E-5.
tired from the Marine Corps and never attained the
Warrant Officer W-4.
petition showing a release 'from active duty in 1983 contains many
errors, inappropriate entries and inconsistencies.
obviously 

The DD Form 214 enclosed with

not a valid document.

This paper is

was married,
58, and later

r were married
nclosed  implies that

"retired" is not
Chief Warrant Officer W-4

1983.
Marine Corps cannot be verified at

, states that she and former

on 6 January 1983.

The invalid DD

was released from active
on 11 March

retirement from the

this Headquarters.

We must, therefore,

5.
be granted favorable consideration.

recommend that

petition not

Head, Separation and
Retirement Branch
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07274-01

    Original file (07274-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. has contacted the Defense Finance and Ohio requesting enrollment in Cleveland, that to enroll at this time would require He was tc that he pay back...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00118-01

    Original file (00118-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 118-01 6 November 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse ’s naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03322-01

    Original file (03322-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. were not properly counseled with regard to SBP coverage prior to his nonelection. Lieutenant Colonel enrollme desire further states that he and Mrs. e SBP and he is aware that, if en- rolled, he will be charged SBP costs back to his date of retire- ment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01623-04

    Original file (01623-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The reference requests an advisory opinion on Sergeant petition to correct his records to show that he is not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05749-01

    Original file (05749-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable Roartl. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of to the proceedings of this willt your application, together naval record and applicable the advisory opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05522-01

    Original file (05522-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2001. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. As stated in Paragraph 010205A of enclosure "had over 4 years of active service as an enlisted member" to be entitled to the special rate of pay as an O-3E.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03968-01

    Original file (03968-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’s naval record In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00769-03

    Original file (00769-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2003. 0769-03 The reference requests an advisory opinion on'- .l__y_ petition to correct her late former husband's records to show that he was enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with former spouse coverage when he died on 12 May 2002. Because it was the intention of the civil court that Gunnery Sergeant Slaterl s SBP coverage continue on as a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08111-00

    Original file (08111-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’ record to , Upon reaching retirement eligibility Master Sergeant 2. was given the opportunity to elect RCSBP coverage in March of 1982.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00930-01

    Original file (00930-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJG Docket No: 930-01 21 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ( Subj: LTCO REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD USMCR Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by...