Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07274-01
Original file (07274-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 7274-01
19 March 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1760 MMSR-6J of 7 December 2001, a copy of which
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. You have been receiving Retiree Account Statements since 1994, which
would show that there were no deductions from your retired pay for the Survivor Benefit Plan
(SBP). You waited seven years to request enrollment, based on the allegation that your spouse
never provided the required written concurrence with a declination. You have provided no
documentation that would support your request. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.

Docket No: 7274-01

In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all
official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely.,,, 
_

_  

. 

.

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

HEADQUARTERS 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
3280  RUSSELL ROA
QUANTICO.  VIRGINIA   22 

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

Y

D

134-S 

I03

 

TO:

 

 

IN

REFER

REPLY
176 0
MMSR-6J
7 

Dee 01

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

ERY

._1.

.,

Ref:

(a) MMER Route Sheet of  

26Nov01, Docket

No.

7274-01

1.

The reference requests an advisory opinion
etition to correct his record
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

on Gunnery
with regard to

2 .
Reserve on

transferred to the Fleet Marine Corps

He is not enrolled in the SBP.
has contacted the Defense Finance and
Ohio requesting enrollment in
Cleveland,
that to enroll at this time would require

He was tc

that he pay back premiums from his retirement date in 1994.

it appears that, by his petition,

3.
requests that he be enrolled in  
premiums because his enrollment form was not properly completed
prior to his  
there is not enough
explanatory or supportive evidence with the petition to warrant
favorable consideration.

Unfortunately,

retirement.

,the SB

We defer further opinion to the Defense Finance and

4.
Accounting Service in Cleveland, Ohio.

Head, Separation and
Retirement Branch
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03322-01

    Original file (03322-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. were not properly counseled with regard to SBP coverage prior to his nonelection. Lieutenant Colonel enrollme desire further states that he and Mrs. e SBP and he is aware that, if en- rolled, he will be charged SBP costs back to his date of retire- ment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08329-00

    Original file (08329-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ecb Docket No: 17 July 2001 8329-00 This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08031-01

    Original file (08031-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. tired from the Marine Corps and never attained the Warrant Officer W-4.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00769-03

    Original file (00769-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2003. 0769-03 The reference requests an advisory opinion on'- .l__y_ petition to correct her late former husband's records to show that he was enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with former spouse coverage when he died on 12 May 2002. Because it was the intention of the civil court that Gunnery Sergeant Slaterl s SBP coverage continue on as a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00118-01

    Original file (00118-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 118-01 6 November 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse ’s naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01623-04

    Original file (01623-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The reference requests an advisory opinion on Sergeant petition to correct his records to show that he is not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03968-01

    Original file (03968-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’s naval record In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05749-01

    Original file (05749-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable Roartl. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of to the proceedings of this willt your application, together naval record and applicable the advisory opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08111-00

    Original file (08111-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’ record to , Upon reaching retirement eligibility Master Sergeant 2. was given the opportunity to elect RCSBP coverage in March of 1982.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00645-09

    Original file (00645-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...