Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08111-00
Original file (08111-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH : ddj
Docket No: 8 11 l-00
20 March 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record
pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record
and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1760 MMSR-6J of 26 February 2001, a copy of which
is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
134-5 

3280  RUSSELL ROA
  22 

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA

D

103

IN REPLY REFER TO:
176 0
MMSR-6J
26 Feb 01

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF THE LATE MASTER SERGEANT

Ref:

(a) MMER Route Sheet of  

14FebO1,  Docket No. 8111-00

1.

The reference requests an advisory on Mrs
,’ 
‘,,
 petition to correct Master Sergeant
ss
show that he elected spouse coverage under the
Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) prior to his death on 13 July 1999.

’

record to

,

Upon reaching retirement eligibility Master Sergeant

2.
was given the opportunity to elect RCSBP coverage in March of
1982.

He did not make an RCSBP election.

3.
Master Sergeant
RCSBP coverage durin
April 1992 thru 31 March 1993.
began on 1 March 1999.
publicized through periodicals of both the Armed Forces and
various associations oriented toward the military community.

The first lasted from 1
Another open enrollment period
"Open Seasons" were highly

had other opportunities to elect
Seasons."

Both these  

4.
Unfortunate
Master Sergeant
his retirement.
entitled to a monthly survivor annuity.

ot find any evidence to indicate that
chose to
Regrettably, Mrs

te in the plan during
, therefore, is not

-

Retirement Branch
By direction of the
of the Marine Corps

d 

’

Commandant



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03968-01

    Original file (03968-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’s naval record In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00769-03

    Original file (00769-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2003. 0769-03 The reference requests an advisory opinion on'- .l__y_ petition to correct her late former husband's records to show that he was enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with former spouse coverage when he died on 12 May 2002. Because it was the intention of the civil court that Gunnery Sergeant Slaterl s SBP coverage continue on as a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08329-00

    Original file (08329-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ecb Docket No: 17 July 2001 8329-00 This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11104-09

    Original file (11104-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08663-07

    Original file (08663-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    08663-07 22 May 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your husband’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on May 19, 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your husband’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019028

    Original file (20080019028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 January 2008, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656-5 (RCSBP Election Certificate) in which he elected spouse-only coverage, option C, full retired pay. However, although he divorced and later remarried on 7 May 1993, he still would not have been eligible to change his SBP election to include spouse coverage within 1 year as he contends he was informed because he had already been afforded an opportunity to elect spouse coverage and he and his then spouse elected not to do so. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0102373

    Original file (0102373.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) information package sent to the former servicemember, when he was initially eligible to establish survivor coverage on the applicant’s behalf, specifically advised the member that his RCSBP election certificate had to be received by the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) within 90 days of receipt of the package at his home. A review of the evidence submitted does not reveal that the deceased member was provided inadequate information...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005060

    Original file (20080005060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to change his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) from "Children only" coverage to "Spouse" coverage. She was provided an application to submit to this Board. Regrettably, based on the evidence, the applicant is not entitled to a correction of the FSM's records to show he elected to change his RCSBP election from "Children only" coverage to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05821-00

    Original file (05821-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 5821-00 11 September 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject ’s widow, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enrolled in the Reserve...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03468

    Original file (BC-2006-03468.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/DPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request. He made no election during that time and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred election until age 60.” During the RCSBP Open Season...