Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00645-09
Original file (00645-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

DIC

Docket No. 645-09
28 April 2009

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

27 April 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQOMC Memo 1741 MMSR-6K
dtd 4 Mar 09, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence

or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when

applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PF

Executive

  

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO:
1741

MMSR-6K
4 Mar 09

 

 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS

    

Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF .

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03341-10

    Original file (03341-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) electing “children- only” coverage with spousal concurrence on 3 June 2009, prior to his effective date of retirement on 1 October 2009. On 3 June 2009,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7171 13

    Original file (NR7171 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC ; Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show termination of Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06000-09

    Original file (06000-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a} Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a timely written request to disenroll from Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) under the spouse category coverage from the date of his divorce on 16 November 2005. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01116-11

    Original file (01116-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5109 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Subject submitted a timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) electing as the sole beneficiary. In February 2011, Petitioner applied to BCNR...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6073 13

    Original file (NR6073 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a declination of Survivor Benefit Plan coverage. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09016-07

    Original file (09016-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1741 MMSR-6 dtd 21 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3381 14

    Original file (NR3381 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner enrolled in spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). 32, The Board, consisting of Mr. Hedrick, Mr. Ruskin, and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03207-09

    Original file (03207-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 July 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09029-10

    Original file (09029-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 29 December 2003, he executed a DD Form 2656 declining participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09976-09

    Original file (09976-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). b. Petitioner is responsible for any unpaid SBP costs that would have beén deducted if he enrolled at the time of his transfer...