Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05253-02
Original file (05253-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH:ddj
Docket No:  
1 October 2002

5253-02

This is in reference to your application for- correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section

1552.

 

oil 1 October 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application  
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC   memorandum 
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

57.30 Pers 

9 13 of 22 August 2002,  a copy of which is

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished  

upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

N AVY 

PERSO

NN EL  COMMAN

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN

 

38055-0000

D

573 0
PERS 913
22 Aug  02

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

RECORDS

Via:

Assistant  for BCNR Matters  

(PERS-OOZCB)

Sub-j:

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

IN THE CASE OF

Ref:

(a) BCNR Memo of 29 Jul 02
(b) Our ltr 1306 PERS 913 of 22 Jan 02 
(NOTAL)
(c) CNO WASHINGTON DC 2119302 DEC 01 NAVADMIN
(d) CNO WASHINGTON DC 2716352 MAR 02 NAVADMIN
(e) OPNAVINST  
(f) Pers-913D E-mail memo of 19  

1160.6A

Jul 02

336/01
074/02

Encl:

(1) BCNR File 05243-02

Per reference (a), the following recommendation and comments

1.
are forwarded concerning PN2 Sorrell's request to approve his
Selective Reenlistment Bonus  
conversion to  the TAR program.

(SRB) in conjunction with his

Petty Officer Sorrel1 was approved for a conversion from USN

USNR(TAR)  in January 2002, per reference  

2.
to 
his approval for conversion into the TAR program, the TAR
Personnelman 
(c) 

(PN) rating was authorized an SRB, per reference

At the time of

lb).

_

Conversion to the TAR program is effected on a monthly

3.
basis, with effective dates of conversion established when the
number of personnel projected in a rating becomes less than the
number of p
zed in that rating.
(b)
established
onversion date during the month of
August 2002
rejection.
was authorized conversion in January for a reenlistment in
August, but in March 2002, reference 
rating from the list of approved SRB ratings.

(d) removed the TAR PN

Regrettably, 

Reference 

w

The procedures contained in reference  

4.
who are in a formal training process for an SRB approved
specialty to maintain eligibility for an SRB, even if

(e) allow personnel

Subj:

REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF

This 

process.

When new bonus  

the SRB is removed from that specialty prior to the end of
levels are published, the
the training  
message announcing the new bonus provides guidance for personnel
In this case, reference
whose SRB has been reduced or removed.
(d) provided a  
lo-day grace period during which an individual
could reenlist to remain eligible for the previously published
bonus.
authorized reenlistment month of  
prior to
There are no other provisions to provide relief for
2002.
someone who has been authorized reenlistment into a special
program, such as the TAR program, if that bonus is later removed
from the authorized list
guarantee  an SRB authorization and SRB approval procedures
outlined in reference (e) do not make an exception for PN2
Sorrell's situation.

lo-day period ended in April 2002, four months

In effect, TAR conversion does not

Fiuqust

.

We recommend disa

5.
from Petty Officer
had been given a guarantee
no such guarantee was given or implied.
for his TAR conversion,
The SRB process in his case was conducted in accordance with the
appropriate policies and regulations, and we found no error or

of eligibility for an SRB in exchange

equest.
appear that he

Although

ce on the part of the Navy.
has two options; he can either convert to the TAR
knowing he has no SRB entit
Per reference (f),
TAR conversion.
his current intention is to decline

Under Navy policy, PN2

can decline the
has indicated

Point  of contact for this matter is PNCS

at DSN 882-

6.
4508,

comm (901) 874-4508.

By direction



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01188-02

    Original file (01188-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1 October 2002 118842 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United Stares Code, section 1552. Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on were reviewed in accordance...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07502-97

    Original file (07502-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Block 20 (Physical Readiness) reads The grades she received for these making her ineligible for advancement and "F/NS" indicating laims she had a medical waiver from body fat measurements due to medication she was taking which caused weight gain. returned to the medical department to receive a waiver from official body fat measurements. screening would not have changed the outcome, as a medical waiver from body fat measurements was not appropriate for the Fall 1995 PRT cycle.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07022-02

    Original file (07022-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a), the following recommendation and comments are...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07191-02

    Original file (07191-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The petitioner were issued orders on 20 February 2001 from the Enlisted Personnel Management Management Center New Orleans, LA to The return to active duty for disenrollment from petitioner reenlisted on 10 July 2001 for six years and received a zone "B" SRB entitlement for NEC 3354. the' NROTC Program. d. The petitioner request to receive all SRB installments and "C" School for the previous reenlistment prior to entering guaranteed the BOOST Program. However, the member is In view of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00177-03

    Original file (00177-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04438-01

    Original file (04438-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Per reference (b), members not SRB eligible who agree to obliserve to train and reenlist for service in a rating or NEC that at the time of the agreement is designated for award of SRB Once the member had may be paid the bonus for that specialty. "B" SRB entitlement for the the time the petitioner attended the training. The petitioner request to adjust the zone "C" SRB d. "B" and receive the higher SRB entitlement to reflect zone entitlement.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06397-06

    Original file (06397-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (d) provided a zone “A” SRB award level of 1.5 for the PR rate at the time of the member’s reenlistment. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04588-02

    Original file (04588-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ‘I JLP: ddj Docket No: 4588-02 8 October 2002 This is in reference provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. to.your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05848-03

    Original file (05848-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) listed a zone 'C" SRB entitlement for the MA rate at the time the petitioner received BUPERS order 2402. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08063-02

    Original file (08063-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) listed NAVHOSP GREAT The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment...