Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04947-01
Original file (04947-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

ELP
Docket No. 4947-01
11 January 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

considered your application on
Your allegations of error and injustice were

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records,
sitting in executive session,
9 January 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

. 

.

The Board found that you were inducted into the Navy on 8 June
1943 for two years at age 19.
advanced to electrician's mate third class in December 1943 and
and were hospitalized in February 1944 for about 20 days due to
scarlet fever.

The record reflects that you were

The record reflects that your ship,
landing of troops at Luzon in January 1944.
while at Mariveles Bay,
the beach.
you were treated for wounds suffered as a result of this incident
or that you were evacuated to a hospital ship for treatment.

On 15 February 1945,
the ship struck a mine on its approach to

Available medical records contain no evidence that

LSM 169, participated in the

You subsequently were advanced to electrician's mate second and
first class and were honorably discharged on 30 April 1946.

The Board also noted your

However, no such evidence could be found.

In its review of your application, the Board conducted a careful
search of your records for any evidence that would show that you
received treatment for injuries suffered as the result of your
ship hitting a mine.
The Board specifically noted the magazine article you submitted
which shows a picture of LSM 169 burning after striking a mine.
The article states that several of the crew on board were wounded
but provides no particulars.
contention to the effect that you were not injured but were
evacuated to a hospital ship for shock and that you refused the
Purple Heart Medal when asked to sign for the award.
be eligible for the Purple Heart Medal, an individual must have
been wounded or received injuries as a result of action against
an enemy of the United States.
have required treatment by a medical officer.
difficult now, 56 years later,
Purple Heart Medal without eyewitness testimony.
statements from at least two credible individuals who actually
witnessed your injuries,
such as someone who was also on board
the ship with you.
awarding the Purple Heart Medal.
has been denied.
will be furnished upon request.

there is no basis for
Accordingly, your application

The names and votes of the members of the panel

Absent such evidence,

In order to

The wound or injuries must also

to establish entitlement to the

It is very

You need

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

You are entitled to have

. 

’

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2012-125

    Original file (2012-125.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Naval Hospital, St. Albans, New York, from 27 March 45 to 17 April 45 for psychiatric rehabilitation.” The doctors reported that he remained depressed, was unfit for duty, and should be medically discharged because “treatment under conditions of service will be difficult due to slow development of hos- tility.” They noted that he had “been informed of the Board’s findings and does not desire to submit a statement in rebuttal.” On May 9, 1945, the Commander of the 3rd Naval District issued...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02998-01

    Original file (02998-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. considered your application on After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | AR20070005644C071029

    Original file (AR20070005644C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Qawiy A. Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Enlisted Record and Report of Separation (WD AGO Form 53-55) be corrected to show that he was wounded in action while he was in the Army and was awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending his WD AGO Form 53-55 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002339

    Original file (20080002339.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that Army records show that her father received a non-battle injury. The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. The available service medical evidence shows that the FSM sustained an injury to his left hand on 27 December 1944 and was hospitalized for treatment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606142C070209

    Original file (9606142C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart for injuries suffered in World War II. While the evidence of record shows that the applicant was a casualty as the result of wounds suffered when the truck he was in hit a mine, it does not specifically show that the wound was the direct result of enemy action. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was...

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2006-004

    Original file (2006-004.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Except in the case of a prisoner of war, the wound for which the award is made must have required treatment by a medical officer . The Board finds that if the applicant had been treated for shrapnel to the face or any other wound during this period, it is very likely such treatment would have been recorded in the applicant's military record. Therefore, due to the passage of time, the applicant’s less than compelling reasons for the 60-year delay, and the lack of sufficient evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019637

    Original file (20110019637.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's WD AGO Form 55 (Army of the United States Honorable Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant requests the FSM's service record be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. posthumously awarding the FSM the: * Purple Heart for injuries sustained in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012292

    Original file (20080012292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service medical records for the period 26 December 1944 through 25 January 1945 show the applicant was treated for frostbite of his feet. As a result the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (first award) during the period from 13 February 1943 to 27 September 1945 and amending his DD Form 214 to add this award. While "severe" frostbite was a justification for award of the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022994

    Original file (20100022994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states, the applicant deserves and should be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds he suffered on 31 August 1944 near Reims while in his platoon. After hospitalization, the applicant did not return to his unit, 146th Engineer Battalion, which could explain why the Purple Heart was not awarded. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011569

    Original file (20100011569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 October 1944, he was placed on a hospital ship and sent to Camp Carson, CO, for treatment. The FSM’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows the FSM sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record, there is an insufficient basis for awarding him the Purple Heart.