DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No:
3 June 1999
7126-98
Your allegations of error and
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 27 April 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 31 July
1996 at age 17.
You reported to active duty on 18 June 1997. A
psychiatric evaluation,
conducted on 15 July 1997, found that you
had an adjustment disorder and should be separated from the Navy.
In this regard, the psychological evaluation noted "periods of
uncontrollable crying, decreased sleep and appetite, recurrent
suicidal and violent ideation, an inability to relax, and
difficulty establishing peer relationships.
received an entry level separation by reason of erroneous entry.
At that time you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
such as the contention that you
were separated due to physical problems.
concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant an
honorable discharge, a change in the reason for separation, and a
better reenlistment code.
assigned to individuals separated within the first 180 days of
active duty.
In this regard, the Board noted your contention
On 28 July 1997 you
However, the Board
An entry level separation is routinely
It is clear from
However, you were separated
The RE-4 reenlistment code is
that physical problems caused your separation.
the record that you were having some physical problems,
especially with your leg and knee.
due to the adjustment disorder.
authorized when an individual is separated due to erroneous
enlistment, and is routinely assigned when an individual fails to
complete recruit training.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
The names and
You are entitled to have the
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01908-01
1908-01 19 July 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. contend that you became worried while in recruit training that you would not be able to pay your bills after you learned...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08277-98
Therefore, the entry level The Board also noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code Further, the Board concluded that since you submitted no evidence that you were incorrectly diagnosed as having a personality disorder, there is no basis to change the reason for your separation. thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06181-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 1999. On 20 January 1998 the separation Regulations require the assignment of an when an individual is separated because of entry level RR-4 reenlistment code performance and conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02399-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 13_06_57 CDT 2000
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 10 August 1998 you received an You were advised of You declined to consult with counsel and Thereafter, the discharge authority Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE—4 reenlistment code to individuals separated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 09116-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.ou enlisted in the Navy ~n 20 September 1999 at age 20. The Board noted that applicable regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00430-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You claimed recurrent suicidal ideation since arriving at recruit training and stabbed yourself because "Nobody would listen to me...now they are listening."
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00562-05
On 17 December 2004 the discharge authority directed an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of fraudulent entry due to alcohol abuse. On 22 December 2004 you were so separated from the Navy, and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02732-01
You were advised of your procedural rights, The discharge The Board Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of erroneous entry. Your doctor provides no evidence of his qualifi- cations or a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation to support his The Board noted contention or to refute the Navy's diagnosis. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02469-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. The record reflects that on 30 June 1998 you were referred to a mental health unit because of suicidal ideation, inability to tolerate authority, and a prior undisclosed history of psychiatric treatment. Separation by erroneous entry is authorized when an enlistment would not have occurred if a disqualifying factor had been known prior to enlistment.