Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06339-00
Original file (06339-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

CRS
Docket No: 6339-00
6 April 2001

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 April 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The record reflects that on 30 July 1970 you received

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 16 July 1970 at
age 17.
nonjudicial punishment for stealing $12 from another recruit. On
25 September 1970 a medical evaluation board found that you were
not physically qualified due to stomach ulcers.
It was also
discovered that you had previously been discharged from the Army
for the same reason.
On 1 October 1970 you received a general
discharge by reason of erroneous enlistment.

In its review of your application  
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
immaturity.
However, the Board concluded that these  
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge,
due to the disciplinary action in less than one year in service
and your apparent fraudulent enlistment.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and votes of the members

Accordingly, your

the,Board carefully weighed all

factos were

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that

You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01212-01

    Original file (01212-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. the recommendation, you elected to waive your right to present After review by your case to an administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08568-00

    Original file (08568-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Review affirmed the proceedings but noted that your absences were caused by your need to care for your sick mother and reduced the period of confinement to seven months. enlisted member within two years of qualifying for retirement "whose term of enlistment expires and who is denied reenlistment . Consequently, adequate remedy is to correct Mr.- records to reflect that his enlistment was extended as requested, that he successfully completed this extended term of enlistment, and that he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06786-01

    Original file (06786-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of your reenlistment, you had completed The record reflects that you were authorized the Vietnam Service Medal for service on board the USS MEREDITH (DD 890). On 8 October 1971 you requested for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial for those two periods of UA totaling about 113 days. insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of an NJP, and the fact that you accepted discharge rather than face trial by court-martial for a UA of more...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04718-99

    Original file (04718-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. IN REPLY REFER TO: 1400/3 MMPR-2 13 Mar 01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF FORMER - ‘ a retired Marine indicates that he completed his he grade of probationary corporal and should have been promoted to the grade of sergeant prior to his retirement from the Marine Corps on 22...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06493-09

    Original file (06493-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2010. As you have not demonstrated that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability on 14 August 1970, rather than unsuitable for service due to a personality disorder, there is no basis for recommending corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05605-01

    Original file (05605-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02152-01

    Original file (02152-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded that these factors...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00566-01

    Original file (00566-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 9 April 1970 you received nonjudicial punishment for treating a noncommissioned officer with contempt and disrespect. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04801-01

    Original file (04801-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Individuals discharged by reason of misconduct normally receive discharges under other than honorable conditions and the Board noted that you were fortunate to received a general discharge. the circumstances of your case, discharge, narrative reason for separation, and the assigned reenlistment code were proper and no changes are warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04805-01

    Original file (04805-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommended you be issued a general discharge by reason of unfitness...