DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TUR
Docket No: 4732-10
7 March 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval:
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 2 March 2011. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
ivjustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 2 May 2007 at age 19 and served
without disciplinary incident.
On 27 March 2008, after being referred for a psychiatric
evaluation to determine your occupational health or fitness,
you were diagnosed with an adjustment disorder, borderline and
dependent personality disorder, and occupational problems. As a
result, you were recommended for an expeditious administrative
separation. The psychiatric report stated, in part, as follows:
While not imminently suicidal or homicidal, he is at much
higher risk of eventually attempting to harm himself or
others through accidental miscalculation if not through
willful action designed to cause harm to himself or others.
In April 2008 you were processed for an administrative separation
by reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed
personality disorder. On 2 May 2008 you received an adverse
separation performance evaluation in which you were not
recommended for retention or advancement due to deficiencies in
your performance and conduct. Subsequently, the discharge
authority directed an honorable discharge by reason of
convenience of the government due to a diagnosed personality
disorder. On 20 May 2008, while serving in paygrade E-3, you
were so discharged and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed allfgpotentially mitigating factors, such as
yeur youth and sire to change your reenlistment code.
vertheless, te. Board concluded these factors were not
sufficient to wayrant a change of your reenlistment code because
of the seriousness of your diagnosed personality disorder which
Yesulted in yout nonrecommendation for retention and
reenlistment. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\\ ;
W. DEAN
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02786-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 17 June 2002 at age 17 and served without disciplinary incident.On 2 March...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02428-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 29 May 1997 at age 20. You were also recommended for Level III alcohol...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06986-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 25 February 1986, you enlisted in the Navy at age 18. On 30 October 1987, you acknowledged by a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03657-09
material together with all material submitted in naval record, of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and applicable to the proceedings of considered by the Board consisted of your application, procedures this Documentary support thereof, your and policies. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed your commanding officer to issue you a general discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to unsuitability as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11326-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TUR Docket No: 11326-07 14 November 2008 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07614-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06128-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board concluded that your nonrecommendation for retention, ineligibility for reenlistment due to the diagnosed physical or mental condition,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00155-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08212-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 4 September 2002, you enlisted in the Navy at age 18. On 3 February 2003, you began another UA. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06809-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 15 June 2000, you enlisted in the Navy at age 21. On 13 June 2001, you were separated with a...