DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
CRS
Docket No: 5467-01
19 October 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 October 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 March 1957
after serving for more than two years in the Army National Guard.
The record reflects that you received two nonjudicial punishments
and were convicted by a summary court-martial.
included unauthorized absences totalling 14 days.
on 23 December 1960 you were honorably separated and transferred
to the Naval Reserve.
general'discharge from the Naval Reserve.
On 11 September 1962 you received a
The offenses
Subsequently,
Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and
overall traits averages,
assigned during periodic evaluations.
trait averages were 2.93 and 2.91, respectively.
conduct mark of 3.0 was required for a fully honorable
characterization of service at the time of separation.
both of which are computed from marks
Your conduct and overall
A minimum
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
immaturity.
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
since your conduct average was insufficiently high to warrant a
In this regard, your marks supported
fully honorable discharge.
only a separation under honorable conditions on 23 December 1960,
but for some reason, you were erroneously separated with a fully
honorable characterization of service.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the members
Accordingly, your
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the ‘Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01439-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. court- martial (SPCM) of disobedience and a day of unauthorized absence (UA) month, a $50 forfeiture of pay, - You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01637-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Characterization of service is determined by a service member's conduct, actions, performance and marks assigned on a periodic basis. The Board also considered your contention that your service warranted an honorable characterization of service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07844-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. Your conduct average was 3.8. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05437-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07288-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07288-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04190-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. conduct mark of 3.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11044-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 18 Nay 1960 at age 18. You were sentenced to confinement at hard...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05636-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 April injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06949-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 February 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. contention' were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of seven NJPs, two minor civil convictions, and your failure to achieve the required average in The Board concluded that...