Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04558-02
Original file (04558-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                2 NAVY ANNEX
                          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

                                                        JRE
                                                        Docket No: 4558-02
                                                        25 February 2003









     This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
     record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
     Code, section 1552.

     A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
     sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13
     February 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
     in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
     applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
     considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
     all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
     applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

     After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
     the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
     establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

     The Board found that you were evaluated by a medical board on 28
     September 2000, and given a diagnosis of multilevel degenerative disc
     disease, lumbar spine, without frank herniation. The medical board
     report indicates that you had full range of motion in the lumbar
     spine, without palpable spasm and not trigger points. The neurological
     examination was normal, with no evidence of motor or dermatomal
     sensory deficit. Deep tendon reflexes were normal, and the straight
     leg test was positive at 45 degrees. On 6 March 2001, the Physical
     Evaluation Board (PEB) made preliminary findings that you were unfit
     for duty, and that you condition was ratable at 10%, as lumbosacral
     strain. You accepted those findings on 11 April 2001, contingent upon
     your being retained on active duty until 13 July 2001. You were
     discharged in accordance with your request on 13 July 2001, with
     entitlement o disability severance pay. The Department of Veterans
     Affairs rated your back condition at 40% for severe intervertebral
     disc disease effective from 14 July 2001, based on the results of an
     examination conducted on 22 October 2001. The report of that
     examination indicate that your condition had become much more severe
     than it was when your were evaluated by the medical board and PEB,
     from a subjective standpoint. The physician who examined on 22
October 2001 indicated that your subjective symptoms were grossly out of
proportion to the physical findings, which were similar to those made by
the medical board. Your were subsequenty awarded a 30% rating for a
depressive disorder which was secondary to your spinal condition. The
rating was effective from 17 May 2002.

The Board was not persuaded that your spinal condition was ratable above
10% disabling at the time of your discharge from the Navy. The
determination of VA rating officials that your condition was ratable at 40%
the day following your discharge was considered not probative of the
existence of error or injustice in your Navy record, because the VA rating
is not supported by objective findings, and the available evidence does not
demonstrate that you suffer from severe intervertebral disc disease.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable
action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its
decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not
previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep
in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,
the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable
material error or injustice.

                                        Sincerely,






                                        W. DEAN PFEIFFER
                                        Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01588

    Original file (PD-2013-01588.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI also attached a one-page statement to his application which was reviewed by the Board and considered in its recommendations. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.In the matter of the chronic back pain s/p discectomy and fusion condition, the Board unanimously recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01750

    Original file (PD2012 01750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA assigned a40% rating for the back condition rated 5292-5293 citing severe limitation of motion of the lumbar spine. The discussed the C&P examination report that the CI held on a chair and compared that examination with prior examinations and concluded the examination confirmed characteristic pain on motion but did not evidence muscle spasm.The Board also considered if additional disability rating was justified for peripheral nerve impairment due to radiculopathy.Although there was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00748

    Original file (PD2012-00748.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200748 SEPARATION DATE: 20020711 BOARD DATE: 20121218 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E‐5 (92G20/Food Service Specialist), medically separated for chronic mechanical low back pain (LBP), multifactorial with spondylolysis L5/S1, facet hypertrophy, and degenerative disc...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01457

    Original file (PD2012 01457.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI requested a reconsideration of the IPEB findings after which the IPEB found the CI unfit for his low back condition, rated 10%. Subsequent multiple VA physical therapy records ranging to the end of 2002,within the 12-month window specified in DoDI 6040.44 regarding VA evaluations for Board consideration, did not demonstrate any deterioration in the CI’s condition, although the Board noted that the CI continued to have ongoing low back pain that was being treated with non-steroidal...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 03102

    Original file (PD 2014 03102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB and VA both rated the back condition at 20% for decreased spinal ROM using different codes;the PEB used code 5241 (spinal fusion) and the VA, code 5237,(lumbosacral strain), IAW VASRD §4.71a.A rating of 20%, under both codes, requires forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine of greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees.The next higher rating, 40%, under both codes requires forward flexion of 30 degrees or less or ankylosis of the entire thoraco- lumbar spine. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02065

    Original file (PD-2014-02065.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The MEB physical exam performed 7 months prior to separation noted tender posterior cervical muscles, pain limited range-of-motion (ROM) and normal strength both upper extremities. The CI’s low back pain (LBP) began...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00970

    Original file (PD 2012 00970.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. Next the Board considered the application of the VASRD criteria operant at the time of separation and found that the CI best fit a rating of 10% for characteristic pain on motion or for slightly limited ROM. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02304

    Original file (PD-2013-02304.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The physical therapy MEB ROM examination on 12 April 2006, is recorded in the chart. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination performed on 7 December 2006, 2 months after separation, the CI reported continued activity limiting low back pain with radiation to the right leg without weakness. The limitation of motion documented in the MEB examinations and the VA C&P examination proximate to separation support a 20% rating under the VASRD General Rating Formula for Diseases and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00196

    Original file (PD2011-00196.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    A PEB adjudicated the lumbar spine condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board considered the 5293 code for intervertebral disc syndrome as referenced by the VA in its rating, noting that the rating criteria for the 5293 code had changed from the 2002 VASRD criteria applicable at separation (and mandated for Board recommendations IAW DoDI 6040.44). Finally, the Board considered a rating under the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00746

    Original file (PD2012-00746.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Low Back Condition. The PEB and VA chose different coding options for the low back condition, but used the 2002 Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) for rating the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation. The VA’s original rating decision coded 5293-5241 analogous to the new §4.71 VASRD code 5241 (Spinal fusion) utilizing the old spine code 5293 (Intervertebral disc syndrome) for a 20% rating for moderate limitation of motion of the lumbar spine.