Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01588
Original file (PD-2013-01588.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2013-01588
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20140807
SEPARATION DATE: 20040621


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty TSgt/E-6 (3P071/Security Forces Craftsman) medically separated for a back condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Air Force Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued an L4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “chronic back pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “chronic back pain status post (s/p) discectomy and fusion” as unfitting, rated 10%. The CI appealed to the Formal PEB which affirmed the IPEB findings and rating.


CI CONTENTION: “I was separated under Code 5237, my doctor that performed the surgery also stated I was able to claim VA Code 5241 Spinal fusion and 5243 intervertebral disc syndrome. I continue pain management and have limited mobility. I was denied the opportunity to cross train even though others in my unit had similar conditions. A review of my records will show I was an asset to the USAF. I was also placed on an Air Force vulnerability list as reductions were occuring. I believe this was an easy reductions as I was well on way to having a successful career. Please consider all of the attached documentation for a minimum of a 30% disability rating. Thank you.”

The CI also attached a one-page statement to his application which was reviewed by the Board and considered in its recommendations. His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service FPEB – Dated 20040413
 VA - (2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Back Pain, s/p Discectomy and Fusion 5237 10% Lumbosacral Degenerative Disc/Joint Disease, s/p Rod Replacement and Fusion 5243 20% 20040818
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 5/NSC x 3 20040818
Rating: 10%
 Combined: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 41026 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).

ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.

Chronic Back Pain Status Post Discectomy and Fusion. Service treatment records (STR) show that the CI complained of gradual progression of chronic low back pain (LBP) since 1996. Radiographic evaluation in 2001 and 2002 revealed degenerative changes at L4-5 and L5-S1 and a mild L4-5 disc bulge with encroachment of the foramina bilaterally. Failing conservative management, which included activity modification, physical therapy, oral medications and epidural injection, the CI elected to have surgery. In September 2002, surgical removal of herniated disc material and spine fusion of L4-5 and L5-S1 was performed. Neurosurgical follow-up through May 2003 indicated the CI was doing very well post-operatively and was only experiencing occasional back pain. However, by July 2003 pain was not very well controlled and an L4 profile was required. The commander’s statement on 2 December 2003 (6.5 months prior to separation) related that the CI was non-deployable but was qualified for assignments/duties that permitted activity restrictions consistent with his profile. At the MEB narrative summary, the CI reported his back pain was improved after surgery, but it continued at a severity level of 2-4/10 pain scale. Physical examination was silent regarding range-of-motion (ROM), tenderness, painful motion, spinal contour or gait. Lower extremity strength and sensation was normal. A primary care clinic examination on 17 February 2004 (4 months prior to separation) reported that the back was straight. Review of the STR found no instances of physician-prescribed bed rest for the lumbar spine condition during the year prior to separation. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination on 24 August 2004 (2 months after separation), the CI reported constant 2-3/10 middle LBP with occasional radiation down the leg. Pain was aggravated by bending and turning and relieved with medication and heat. The CI walked with a slightly stiff gait but did not use a brace or walker for ambulation. Physical examination revealed muscle spasms in the lumbar spine. Measured lumbar spine ROM showed flexion to 45 degrees with painful motion, extension to 10 degrees with painful motion, right and left lateral flexion to 30 degrees and right and left lateral rotation to 30 degrees. Combined ROM was 175 degrees. Lower extremity strength was normal. Straight leg raises were negative bilaterally. An X-ray showed surgical changes consistent with fusion of L4-5 and L5-S1.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB assigned a 10% rating under the 5237 code (lumbosacral strain), while the VA rated the condition 20% under the 5243 code (intervertebral disc syndrome). The Board emphasizes that the General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine applies the same criteria IAW §4.71a regardless of the specific VASRD spine code; although an alternative formula for intervertebral disc disease may be considered (see below). Although Board members agreed the PEB’s 10% rating was reasonably conceded with application of §4.40 (functional loss) or §4.59 (painful motion), routes to a higher rating were considered. The only measured lumbar ROM in evidence proximal to separation was from the C&P examination 2 months after separation. A 20% rating is warranted if forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine is greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees; or if muscle spasm or guarding severe enough to result in an abnormal gait or spinal contour is present. The Board concluded that the C&P examiner’s findings of flexion of 45 degrees justified a 20% rating, but no higher. The Board also considered rating intervertebral disc disease under the alternative formula for incapacitating episodes, but could not find sufficient evidence which would meet even the 10% criteria under that formula. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the chronic back pain s/p discectomy and fusion condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the chronic back pain s/p discectomy and fusion condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20% coded 5237 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Back Pain, Status Post Discectomy and Fusion 5237 20%
RATING 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 201230921, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAF/MRB
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:
         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2013-01588.

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was not appropriate under the guidelines of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities. Accordingly, the Board recommended modification of your assigned disability rating without re-characterization of your separation with severance pay.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding, accept their recommendation and direct that your records be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, United States Air Force. The office responsible for making the correction will inform you when your records have been changed.

                                                               Sincerely,






 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachments:
1. Directive
2. Record of Proceedings

cc:
SAF/MRBR
DFAS-IN

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 03102

    Original file (PD 2014 03102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB and VA both rated the back condition at 20% for decreased spinal ROM using different codes;the PEB used code 5241 (spinal fusion) and the VA, code 5237,(lumbosacral strain), IAW VASRD §4.71a.A rating of 20%, under both codes, requires forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine of greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees.The next higher rating, 40%, under both codes requires forward flexion of 30 degrees or less or ankylosis of the entire thoraco- lumbar spine. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02161

    Original file (PD-2013-02161.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic Low Back Pain Condition .The CI experienced chronic low back pain that radiated into the right leg. The VA C&P examination noted a somewhat weakened hamstring muscle but lower extremity strength was otherwise normal and gait was normal.The Board also noted that the hamstring muscle is innervated by multiple spinal nerve roots L5, S1, S2 and S3 so significant weakness from a single nerve root is not expected. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01606

    Original file (PD-2013-01606.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board directed attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.PEB rated the chronic LBP20%, coded 5237 (lumbosacral strain),citing flexion limited to 45 degrees and noting absence of radiculopathy.The VA rated the degenerative disease lumbar spine,back condition, at 10% ascoded 5243(intervertebral disc syndrome),citing the limitation of motion from the August 2004 C&P examination.The ROM reported at the time of the MEB NARSUM did not support a rating higher than the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01966

    Original file (PD2012 01966.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    MINORITY OPINION This Board member recommends a 40% rating for severe limitation of motion of the lumbar spine based on the pain limited flexion of 10 degrees at the MEB NARSUM exam and pain limited flexion of 30 degrees at the VA C&P exam. The MEB NARSUM exam documented lumbar flexion that was limited to only 10 degrees by pain, which indicates a severe limitation of motion. Although the VA C&P examination was after separation, it was actually closer in time to the date of separation, and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00814

    Original file (PD 2014 00814.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Anterior Lumbar Fusion524120%Low Back Strain with Sciatica5243-523720%20100128Left Leg Numbness Associated with Low Back Strain with Sciatica852010%20100128L5-S1 Herniated DiskCategory IISee Above20100128MicrodiskectomyCategory IISee Above20100128Other x1 (Not in Scope)Other x520100111 Combined: 20%Combined: 70%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20100420 (most proximate to date of separation) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00363

    Original file (PD2012-00363.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB examiner reported that pain and bilateral sciatica were present, but were much better since surgery. 10 months after separation, a VA clinic provider reported that the CI was a student. In its deliberation, the Board considered that the two service ROM exams 2 PD1200363 performed 3 months apart were identical, and that the outpatient VA follow-up visit performed 10 months after separation noted the pain severity had lessened, over the counter medication was being used for pain...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02047

    Original file (PD-2013-02047.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Subjective Low Back Pain524110%Degenerative Disc Disease L4-5; S/P L4 Laminectomy; L5 Discectomy, Lumbar Spine524320%20050819Other x 0 (Not In...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00117

    Original file (PD-2014-00117.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Physical exam showed decreased, but unmeasured, range-of-motion (ROM) of the lumbar spine.At the physical therapyexam on 19 September 2005 (2 months prior to separation), pain limited motion was noted to occur on flexion, left lateral flexion and rotation (see chart below).Increased pain from motion “quickly returned to baseline.” All measurements were repeated three times.At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam on 13 February 2006 (3 months after separation) the CI complained of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01931

    Original file (PD-2013-01931.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there was left hip pain with flexion/abduction and no pain radiation into the groin. straight leg raise; Normal strength; No Deluca criteria§4.71a Rating-20%10% invalid font number 31502 The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB coded the chronic LBP condition as 5237, lumbosacral or cervical strain, and rated at 10%. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00870

    Original file (PD 2013 00870.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back pain condition, characterized as “chronic myofascial thoracic pain syndrome,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as not meeting medical standards IAW AFI 48-123. X-rays and computer aided tomograms of the spine done as part of his work up were normal without evidence of fracture or disc problem.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) dated 24 May 2007,7 months prior to separation,described in the physical examination that the CI demonstrated “…normal gait and station,...