DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
S
LCC: yrj
Docket No: 3372-02
16 July 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 16 July 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1070 PERS-3
is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
Your allegations of error and injustice were
12E/21 of 21 June 2002, a copy of which
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE
PERSONNEL
N AVY
COMMAND
NAV Y
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
1070
PERS-312E/21
1 2
JUN
;?I2
From:
To:
Via:
Subj:
Commander, Navy Personnel Command
Executive Director,
Assistant, Board for Correction of Naval Records
(Pers-OOZ)
Board for Correction of Naval Records
ION ICO
Ref:
(a) BCNR Docket Number 3372-02
Per reference (a),
1.
correct.
shows his date of initial entry into military service
31 January 1986.
A review of member's enlistment document DD Form 4
in our opinion the member's DIEMS date is
(DIEMS) as
A member is eligible
2.
and REDUX election
uniform service on
enters the delayed
to make a
15-year Career Status Bonus
only if the member first became a member of a
or after 01 August 1986. The date a member
entry program is the individual's DIEMS date.
By direction
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03943-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the members of the panel will be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06007-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04624-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the following recommendation concerning L. Enclosure (l), the petitioner is requesting special 3 consideration for wavier of his Date of Initial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00817-02
In atldition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or In this connection, the Board substantially conct~rrec-1 with the co~ii~nents contained in injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable niaterial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06994-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your naval record and III addition, the Board considered the advisory nlemorandum 7220 Ser N 130C3/021.10071 of 2 I February 2002, a CNO After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02111-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04056-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the extension agreement of 13 December 2001 and allow his OTEIP extension to June 2002 be established.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04293-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Entr=DEP) Date (ADSD) of 25 August 1986. is requesting to change his DIEMS date from his Delayed date of 14 July 1986 to his Active Duty Service 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05291-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 26 March and 1 April 2002, copies of which...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00694-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002, reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction...