Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00694-02
Original file (00694-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 694-02
10 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 10 September 2002,
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1070 MMSB 13 of 16 April 2002, a copy of which is
attached.

Your allegations of error and injustice were

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT BRANCH (MMSB)

2008 ELLIOT ROAD

QUANTICO, VA  

22134-5030

HISA N REPLY REFER TO.

107 0
MMSB-13
16 Apr 2002

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

Major Bias'

PAR 

Pay Entry Base Date is 83 10 15 and it is shown

1.
in Total Force System (TFS) as such. Per the provisions of
DODFMR,
84 as a midshipman is not creditable for basic pay purposes.
Therefore,
is required by this Branch.

his Pay Entry Base Date cannot be 83 03 07.

010104K  his service from 28 August 84 to 5 December

No action

Records Correspondence Section
Personnel Management Support Branch
By direction of the
Commandant of the Marine Corps



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02038-02

    Original file (02038-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 11 April 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In view of the above facts, there is no basis for expungement of his military record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05947-03

    Original file (05947-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, ' when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. No correction to his Marine Corps record is reauired.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05668-01

    Original file (05668-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, regulations and policies. VIRGINIA 22 134-6 103 S TO: IN REPLY.REFER 1650 MMMA-3 llDecO1 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECT1 NAVAL RECORDS 3R, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF (BCNR) Subj: REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION FORMER MARINE Upon review of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02041-01

    Original file (02041-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) for removal of the record and 02 USMC He petitioned the porting Senior fitness report of 980831 to 990731. requests removal of his failures of selection. Performance Evaluation Review Board He failed selection He petitioned the (PERB) for removal of the rting Senior fitness report of 980831 to 990630. equests removal of his failures of selection. Head, Personnel Management Support was removed from the OMPF on 5 October emphatically states that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03861-09

    Original file (03861-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 June 4009, -Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10601-06

    Original file (10601-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by memorandum 1070 MNSB-13, 27 December 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10026-07

    Original file (10026-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10026-07 27 May 08This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Since he did...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09235-02

    Original file (09235-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Section, Personnel Management Support Branch, Personnel Management Division (MMSB-30) has placed a memorandum in your record amending the contested fitness report to show you should have been ranked among five officers, rather than six; and that you should be ranked fifth of five. Board. Reference (b) is the performance evaluation The petitioner contends that an administrative error 2 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04822-99

    Original file (04822-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The adverse letter qualifies as "other reports, or correspondence of a military nature" per paragraph b . d. The adverse letter was the result of a report to CMC Sergean Sergean (MMPR-2) by known by this Divis rebutted by 4. provide advisory opinion and recommendations. the adverse fitness report precipitated the adverse letter.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02742-01

    Original file (02742-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board 29 March 2001, a copy of which is attached. In its proceedings, the PERB concluded that the error was in 3. the "from" dates on the petitioner's fitness reports for the periods...