Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02342-02
Original file (02342-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 2342-02
3 December 2002

Dear SEAMAN RECRUIT

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1000 Pers 3
which is attached.

12E/06 of 4 November 2002, a copy of

 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENTOFTHENAV

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380550000

Y

From:
To:
Via:

Commander,
Executive Director,
Assistant,
(Pers-OOZ)

Navy Personnel Command

Board for Correction of Naval Records

Board for Correction of Naval Records

Subj:

ADVISORY OPINION IC

Ref:

(a) BCNR Docket Number 02342-02

In reference (a),

1.
enlistment contract be changed to read October
November 8, 1954.

subject member requested

that his
7, 1954, vice

he made application for enlistment in the U. S. Navy. On

According to the member's service record, on October 5,

2.
1954,
October 7,
enlisting in the U. S. Navy.
the member's service record shows that on November 8, 1954, he
enlisted in the U. S. Navy for 4 years.

1954 he had a physical examination for the purpose of

The enlistment contract on file in

It is our opinion that  

3 .
date of his enlistment contract be disapproved.

the member's request to change the



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07923-02

    Original file (07923-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum is attached. board process precludes Sergean based upon a majority vote of the board members, his record was not competitive with the records of the Marines selected for promotion.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04544-02

    Original file (04544-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    All naval aviators desiring ACCP are required to follow these applicable ACCP messages, and apply as instructed in order to be eligible to receive ACCP. To receive ACCP, all naval officers must be eligible and apply CNO’s messages. Precedence in this matter has been set in previous cases by members who have requested and been denied ACCP back-dated contracts, because they failed to apply.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05238-02

    Original file (05238-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. enlistment contract length is correct and should Three-year enlistments are not authorized as This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08823-02

    Original file (08823-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of h all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and your application, together applicable statutes, regulat opinion furnished by NPC which is attached. Consequently, on of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice. The petitioner at 3 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05178-02

    Original file (05178-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S MEH:ddj Docket No: 1 October 2002 5 178-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. The petitioner discharged paygrade was E-5. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04999-02

    Original file (04999-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 4 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted your husband's naval record and applicable Your allegations of error and considered your After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07306-02

    Original file (07306-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. change will give the member an EAOS of 27 September 2003. recommend the petitioner's enlistment This Additionally, this change will allow the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01188-02

    Original file (01188-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1 October 2002 118842 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United Stares Code, section 1552. Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on were reviewed in accordance...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04972-02

    Original file (04972-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition; the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06127-02

    Original file (06127-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member p session, considered your injustice were reviewed in to the proceedings of this your application, together opinion furnished by NA copy of which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ith all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and RUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6197 of 4 October 2002, a In addition, the Board considered the advisory n of the entire record, the Board found that the cient to establish the existence of...